My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/11/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/11/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:53:47 PM
Creation date
10/26/2016 4:16:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/11/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Wait to see what happens with PACT Charter School —if PACT ended up buying a portion <br />of the former Legacy Christian Academy property owned by Hageman Holdings. PACT <br />Charter only needs a portion of the former Legacy Christian Academy site (about half). <br />If the PACT Charter purchase took place, the City could pick up about 40 acres of the <br />remaining land for the business park. <br />UPDATE: PACT Charter School has indicated they have made a site selection for their <br />new school campus —that being the Legacy Christian Academy site. For a number of <br />reasons, they are unable to make that decision final, and enter into a formal purchase <br />agreement, until at least fall of 2017. Likely, closing would occur sometime in 2018. This <br />is the best -case scenario for PACT from a timing perspective. As a result, counting on <br />this action to occur is speculative at this point. <br />Hageman Holdings has indicated they currently don't have a specific timeline RE their <br />school site. They are willing to wait for their vision to come to fruition. <br />D. If developers are not interested, and PACT Charter doesn't get their deal done, staff <br />should bring back a future discussion about potentially considering a City purchase. <br />Staff is concerned the upfront cost -benefit of a city purchase of the Pearson property is <br />diminishing, considering the purchase price is now nearly double what was originally <br />contemplated. <br />• In order for the City to purchase the Pearson property now, we would need to <br />come up with $1,465,501 (about $30,000 per acre or$0.75 psf). Originally, the <br />City discussed a price of roughly $800,000 (about $18,000 per acre or $0.41 psf). <br />• In order to get arterial infrastructure completed, the City estimated a $31,000 <br />cost per acre (about $.075 psf or $1,393, 000 for the Pearson 48 acres). <br />• Therefore, if the city were to purchase the Person property now (48 acres), and <br />install arterial infrastructure, we'd be looking at an investment of about <br />$2,858,000, $63,600 per acre, or $1.46 psf. That price does not include holding <br />costs, time -value of money, internal site infrastructure, etc. <br />• We believe the asking price for industrial land is roughly $2.00-$2.50 psf. <br />However, it is very common for the City to sell property at the low end of the <br />market, or even with a subsidy (i.e. $1.00-$1.75 psf). <br />• The EDA has about $2.1M available (between the County EDA/HRA, EDA fund, <br />and EDA RLF). We would need to pull dollars from other sources in order to <br />make this project work. NOTE: this is a departure from the original discussion — <br />which assumed the EDA would have enough dollars to cover. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.