Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />'i <br /> I <br /> <br />Special City Council/Staff/Commission Chairperson Workshop dated <br />February 8, 1984. <br /> <br />5. Regular Charter Commission minutes dated February 9, 1984. <br /> <br />6. Special Charter Commission public hearing dated February 15, 1984. <br /> <br />LETTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS <br /> <br />The Park Commission noted the following: <br /> <br />1. Letter from Chairman Donovan to Mr. Arne Stefferud regarding the Issues <br /> Paper on Local Park Grants. <br /> <br />2. Letter from Sheila Beyer to Mr. Tim Kelsey regarding his time spent <br /> flooding the rinks at the Ramsey Elementary School. <br /> <br />PARK COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case %1: Plans and S~ecs For the Rebiddin~ Of Irrigation System For Central <br /> Park: <br /> <br />City Engineer Peter Raatikka stated that Council has order for rebids on the <br />Central Park irrigation system for March 20, 1984. Some revisions have been <br />made to the specs in order to bring the system costs down. One of the revisions <br />is to go with a 300 gallon/minute well rather than a 550 gallon/minute well. <br />This revision could save the City roughly $22,000.00. The specs have also gone <br />to a 30 Hp pump rather than a 60 Hp pump. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka then noted that Mr. Schnelle received a letter from Aqua Line <br />Engineering regarding a new sprinkler system they have developed with what <br />they call a Hunter Head; it is not as heavy duty as the Toro Recreational <br />Head but it is lighter weight and more easily replaced. The cost of the <br />Hunter Head is $18.00 versus the Toro Recreational Head at $80.00. A savings <br />of $8,000 - $10,000 could be realized going with the Aqua Line system, over <br />and above the $22,000 savings on the well and pump. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that an additional $5,000-$6,000 saving could be realized <br />by eliminating in-field sprinkling system; that an alternative would be to <br />install a coupler and manually spray the in-fields with hoses as required. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is that the bids should go out with as many options as <br />possible and all options can be explored at the time bids come in. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec was present and stated there is a good possibility that hockey <br />fathers will want to construct a hockey rink at Central Park and a water <br />line to serve the rink should be included in the specs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lichter suggested a gate valve also be included in the specs to <br />control rate of water flow. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Lokker to recommend rebidding of the Central Park <br />irrigation system with down sizing of the well, water line to serve hockey <br />rink, use of a coupler to service in-fields and gate valve. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lichter seconded the motion. <br /> <br />P & R/February 22, 1984 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />