Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Stan Data - 5510 140th Lane - Stated that the residents of Flintwood I did <br />meet with Mr. Carson to arrive at the best compromise. The bottom line is <br />that this development is not preferred by Flintwood I residents; we still <br />prefer one acre lot development with no public utilities. Our major complaint <br />besides public utilities, is that high density housing would result in a <br />reducting in property value in Flintwood I. We hope Mr. Carson will take <br />this into consideration when designing the PUD housing types. Flintwood I <br />is concerned with loss of privacy, burm, drainage problems (for which <br />alternatives have been suggested which will not incur costs to Flintwood I), <br />MSA street through the project (which we understand is constraint put on <br />developer by City). The residents of Flintwood I view the plan the developer <br />is presenting tonight as the best compromise, under the circumstances, provided <br />that Flintwood I concerns are not overlooked. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson - As the project progresses and the actual design is laid out, we <br />will be happy to meet with residents of Flintwood I. <br /> <br />John Lichter - 14060 Fluorine - What is Council approving tonight -- just <br />the density requested for the area? <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle - Council would be approving zoning for the area; the developer <br />is here for PUD zoning. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich - The developer is here of approval of preliminary development <br />plan. Zoning approval comes after preliminary plan approval. Tonight's <br />meeting is for approval of preliminary PUD plan. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmember Schlueter - According to ordinance there are many items to <br />be submitted by the developer, such as sewer distribution plans, in order <br />to obtain preliminary plan approval. Ordinance also states that these <br />items must be submitted to P & Z for their recommendation prior to going <br />to Council and I see no evidence in P & Z minutes that this has been done. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich read from the ordinance what the applicant must submit at the <br />time of preliminary development plan approval request. Some of the items <br />mentioned were: drawings and written statements regarding location, size <br />and proposed uses; density of land to be developed; location and size of <br />open spaces; plans for distribution of waste; parking; timetable; topographic <br />map; character of PUD; alternate ownership; total anticipated population. <br /> <br />John Lichter - How can Council act on this tonight if all there items have <br />not been submitted? <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec - The developer is looking for concept approval from Council <br />prior to preparing all the expensive items required by ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Lichter - The residents o~ Flintwood I have had some very good me,tings <br />with Mr. Carson regarding the PUD; even the concept approval should include <br />the conditions arrived at as a result of those meetings and we don't see <br />those conditions listed on the preliminary plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich - The last PUD in Ramsey obtained a general concept approval <br />that was conditioned on proper acceptance of a preliminary plan approval. <br />That is what NDR is requesting tonight, then they provide all that the <br />ordinance requires, request final approval and apply for rezoning. What <br />NDH could receive tonight from Council is: 'Yes, in general we approve, <br />but we want to see all items that are required by ordinance' <br /> <br />C/January 10, 1984 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />