Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Findings of fACT <br />Flintwood Hills Second Addition <br />Page 6 April, 1984 <br /> <br />B. Alternatives <br /> <br />The MWCC in its Northwest Area Study (June, 1980) studied 49 <br />different wastewater treatment alternatives for the Cities of <br />Anoka, Champlin, Ramsey, Andover, and Brooklyn Park. They <br />included upgrading the Anoka Plant, land application, upg[ade or <br />individual septic tanks and drainfields and construction of the <br />CAB interceptor to service the communitees. The recommended <br />alternative was construction of the CAB with treatment at the <br />Metro Plant. It was later decided that Ramsey and Anoka would <br />use the existing Anoka Treatment Plant on an interim basis until <br />it reached its maximum capacity. Therefore, Ramsey adopted its <br />Comprehensive Plan which stated that future development in the <br />Urban Area of the City would utilize MWCC facilities for <br />wastewater disposal. Ordinances were later adopted to require <br />existing developments that were polluting groundwater and <br />creating a health hazard to connect to the municipal sewer <br />system. <br /> <br />In September, 1981, C.E.D. Inc. completed a Comprehensive Water <br />Plan for the City of Ramsey which concluded that wells would be a <br />feasible source of water supply in Ramsey. The City had <br />considered the continued use of private wells for future <br />development in Ramsey. The City selected to proceed with a <br />municipal water system for the following reasons: <br /> <br />1. Most cost effective from a capital cost perspective. <br />2. Provides better fire protection <br />3. Easier to monitor the impacts from the landfill. <br />4. Municipal wells are constructed to greater depths than <br /> private wells and are less subject to impacts from the <br /> landfill. <br /> <br />VI. CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The proposed project will meet all MPCA, DNR, and Health <br />Department requirements and standards. Areas which could have <br />had a potential for significant environmental effects have been <br />identified and evaluated. No potentially significant negative <br />impacts were identified. Therefore, no environmental impact <br />statement is required. <br /> <br />Based on the findings and conclusions contained herein and the <br />reference documents, including all comments received in the <br />environmental assessment worksheet, the City of Ramsey determined on <br /> , 1984 that an environmental impact statement is <br />not required on the proposed project. <br /> <br />Thomas G. Gamec, Mayor <br />City of Ramsey <br /> <br /> <br />