My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/17/1984
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1984
>
Agenda - Council - 04/17/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:14:18 AM
Creation date
7/13/2004 1:52:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/17/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />FINDINGS OF FACT 00 <br /> Ronald Danner <br /> <br />1) That the applicant has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance to place <br />a structure such that it does not comply with City Code. <br /> <br />Z) That the applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing <br />on April 17, 1984. That said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes <br />of said public hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> <br />3) That the applicant's property is approximately one plus acre in size and that the <br />legal description is as follows: <br /> <br />The North 100.00 feet of the West 187.00 feet of Lot 3, Block 7, KLEMISH <br />ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota and the South 100 feet of the North <br />ZOO feet of the West 187 feet of Lot 3, Block 7, KLEMISH ADDITION, Anoka <br />County, Minnesota. <br /> <br />4) That the applicant's request is to construct a structure Z0 feet from the rear property <br />line instead of the 35 feet required by City Code. <br /> <br />5) That there are no exceptional, unique and extraordinary circumstances or conditions <br />applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not <br />apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. <br /> <br />6) That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br />property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same district and <br />in the same vicinity; specifically, Bob's Super Valu is located closer to the rear property <br />line that permitted by code. <br /> <br />7) That the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent <br />property and will not materially impair the intent and purpose of this ordinance or the <br />public interest. <br /> <br />8) That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property, or the intended <br />use of said property, for which the variance is sought, is not of so general or recurrent <br />a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation <br />for such conditions or situation. <br /> <br />9) That the variance observes the spirit and intent of this ordinance, produces substantial <br />justice and is not contrary to the public interest. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.