Agenda - Council - 06/24/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I Page Nine Hennepin County project at the'NSP Riverside plant. This pro}ect might have some impact on that portion of Anoka County south of 1-69/4. Because of the uncertainties as to the status of the Riverside project, feasibility analysis- based upon all of Anoka County generated waste is realistic at this time. In implementing a processing facility there are many more barriers which need to be assessed before any decision can be made. These barriers would include consideration of waste flow, waste flow guarantees, impact of other facility districting, capital cost, competition with landfills, policies and metropolitan regional plan, most appropriate and most cost effective processing scheme, facility lacation, availablity of energy users, and interest of energy users. In order to adequately evaluate which w~ste processing strategy would be of the greatest benefit to Anaka County, the County should engage the sevices of a q~:lljfJed engineering firm to undertake a feasibility analysis which would assess all of the factors having a bearing on the selection of a waste processing alternative. In looking at the success and failure of other facilities which have bccn implemented, it appears that the system success has been due more to the presence of a good sound market for the product being produced than it has been a result of a good or bad technology being used. For this reason, the County probably should direct the engineering review to.' l) identify and evaluate, together with the County l~xa'd, market opportunities that may exist within the County; 2) evaluate workable abatement processing options that may be available to service these markets; 3) provide guidance for implementation of abatement processing services; and/4) identify restraints to implementation and how these restraints may be overcome. Such abatement processing evaluation should deal primarily with mechanical i separation/RDF, waste _combustion units, and incineration t.o using by means of combustion un,ts for plant sizes of 350 -500 tons per day'and 1,000 - 1,600 tons per d~. Evaluation should also include alternative abatement I processes that may be compatible with and enhance the basic abatement process being considered. I I To accomplish the obave (County office paper, yard waste composting, municipal technical assistance, processing analysis and evaluations) it is estimated that one staff position and $&6,000 - $1 !1,000 would be needed. (See Appendix III.)