Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Co,mncJlmcmbcr Schlueter referred to item ~2~ (Letter dated January 15, 1984 <br />from !~ayor Gamec to }/~. Louis BreL~hurst of the Metropolitan Waste Control <br />(?o~'nis~'ion regarding ~uxisey's second sewer connection). Councilmem2eer <br />Scl~lueter stated that ~'.~ayor Ga~ec's request for second sewer connection is <br />premature considering preliminary plat approval for the P.U.D. has not taken <br />[,lace. Councilmember Schlue%er then referred to the 3rd paragraph of this <br />subject letter and ~.~ayor G~ec's statement that the City is in the process <br />of a?proving a hig?~ density P.U.D., and stated that she as a councilmember <br />is in the }-~.rocess of looking at the proposed P.U.D., not approving it. <br /> <br />;.~yor Gamec stated that if the councilmembers feel the letter needs to be <br />corrected, they should make a motion to that effect. Otherwise, ~,~yor G~mec <br />stated he intends to stand on the letter as ~Titten; that it may be an <br />important political issue to some people, but not to him. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schlueter referred to Item ~30, (Resolution ~83-215 dated <br />December 20, 1983 supporting the location of a racing facility in the City <br />of Blaine). Councilmember Schlueter stated that she had abstained on that <br />resolution, that the minutes of that meeting reflect that she abstained but <br />the resolution itself records her voting in favor of. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that the resolution will be corrected. <br /> <br />STAFF REPORTS <br /> <br />Council noted the following Staff reports: <br /> <br />a) City Administrator <br />b) Building Official <br />c) Police Chief <br />d) City Engineer <br /> <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: g ...... <br /> Receivin /Accepting/Rejecting Co~uter Software And Hardware Bids: <br /> <br />Ms. Ann Carroll of Thompson and Company and City Accountant Moen were present. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schlueter complimented Ms. Carroll on her compilation and <br />comparison report of the bids. <br /> <br />Ms. Carroll stated that none of the vendors met all of the requirements, but <br />certain vendors are better in certain areas. Thompson and Company feels that <br />Teleterminals appears to best meet Ramsey's needs in a long run, particularly <br />in training and support. Teleterminals seems most willing and able to work <br />with Ramsey in a creative way. <br /> <br />Council then reviewed the bids with Ms. Carroll. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that since this is such a complex bid and <br />difficult to analyze and financial matters have not been worked out, the City <br />would like to not reject any bids, but commence entering into contract <br />negotiation with the most successful bidder. If an agreeable contract is <br />arrived at, enter into that contract and reject all other bidders. However, <br /> <br />C/January 24, 1984 <br /> Page 7 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />