Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />! <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />and moved for its edoptior,: <br /> <br />iht roduced <br /> <br />the fc,] ] ow.~ ng rest, 1 ut <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #86- <br /> <br />RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF <br />Avenue #86-13 Roanoke> <br /> <br />REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT <br /> <br />(153rd <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, i t <br />streets by sealcoat)r,g: <br /> <br />i s proposed to irnpr, ove the fol lowing <br /> <br />e) 15~?rd Aver, ua N.W. <br />Roanoke Street N.W. <br /> <br />lyir, g betweer, T.H. #47 and <br /> <br />and to. a~sess the ber, efited property for all or a portion of the <br />cost of the improven~er, t, pursuar, t to Chapter 21~,.~1 of the City <br />Code. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1 ) That the proposed i ~provement be referred to Mr. <br />Peter R. Raatikke of Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. for the <br />study and that he is ir, structed to report to the City Council <br />with ali cc, r, venier~t speed advising the Council ir, a prelin~inary <br />we.), as to whether the proposed in~provement is feasible and as to <br />whether it should best be ~ade as proposed or in connect ion with <br />so~,le other improve~nent, and the estimated cost of the improvement <br />as recormer~ded. <br /> <br />The n~,-,tic, r~ for the adoption of the foregoir, g resolution was duly <br />seconded by Cr, uncil~,~e~ber arid upon vote beir~g taken <br />thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:. _. <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />whereupor, said resolutior, was declared duly passed and adopted by <br />the Ramsay City Council this the 28th day of January, 1986. <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />Mayor <br /> <br />Actir, g City Administrator/Clerk <br /> <br /> <br />