My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/25/1986
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1986
>
Agenda - Council - 03/25/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 8:28:46 AM
Creation date
7/15/2004 9:11:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/25/1986
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Council tabled any action on the 1985 sealc~attng projects until me regular <br />Council meeting in April. <br /> <br />Mr. l~aatikka stated that at the February 25, 1986 Council meeting, Council <br />expressed ooncern for what landscaping it,s were being deleted fr~m the <br />project. Mr. Raattkka explained that plantings are being deleted. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated trees and curbing are a hindrance to seasonal <br />maintenance of the parking lot. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann expressed ooncern that if ooncrete work in the parking <br />lot is deleted and there is a ~et savings below the $80,000, the developer <br />would apply that savings to plantings more appropriately placed to buffer Anoka <br />residential. <br /> <br />M~tion by Councilmember Sorteberg to adopt Resolution ~86-40 accepting the bid <br />of Matt Bullock Contracting G~mpany, Inc. for a total ~ost not to ex~c~ <br />$88,680.00. In addition, the ~ontractor shall be required to meet all <br />oontractual obligations of the City as laid out in the specifications, <br />including performance bond. Further, to approve ~hange Order No. 1, which <br />would reduoe the oontract ~,ount by $9,345.00 to $79,335.00. <br /> <br />Mr. Esrtley suggested that the change order be approved in a separate motion. <br /> <br />Mayor Reitman was reluctant to address the issue with t~o motions on the chance <br />that the motion to approve the change order would not carry. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />Councilm~nber Sorteberg withdrew his motion. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seoonded by Councilmember Schlueter to <br />accept bids received on G~urchill Estates site improvements. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmemt~rs Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. 9oting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Sorteberg and seoonded by Counci~r COx to adopt <br />Resolution ~86-40 ~warding the bid for (l~urchill Estates site improvements to <br />Matt Bullock Contracting Cc~npany, Inc. for a total (x)st not to exceed <br />$88,680.00. Further, to approve ~hange Order No. 1 decreasing the project ~ost <br />by $9,345.00; giving a net cost of $79,335.00. In addition, the ~ontractor <br />shall be required to meet all (x)ntractual obligations of the City as laid out <br />in the specifications, including performance bond. ~his resolution is <br />oontingent upon the cx)ntractor entering into an acceptable development <br />agreement, accept_able being determined by the City Engineer based on Council <br />ooncern expressed at the March 6, 1986 meeting. (Please refer to resolution <br />file for Resolution %86-40). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Beit~an, Councilmembers Sorteberg, COx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />March 6~- 1986 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.