Laserfiche WebLink
standards, and provided miscellaneous other appurtenant improvements.And during construction it was discovered <br /> that five areas of Sunwood Drive were constructed with less than 2 inches of bituminous pavement so <br /> approximately 1%2 inches of existing aggregate base was removed and replaced with 1'/2 inches of bituminous <br /> pavement to provide a minimum of 3'/2 inches of bituminous pavement throughout this entire segment of Sunwood <br /> Drive,thereby allowing for a second mill and overlay in the future when needed. <br /> Notification: <br /> Notice for this Assessment Hearing was published in the City's official newspaper,the Anoka Union Herald, on <br /> Friday, September 30th, and individual Assessment Hearing notices were mailed to all property owners proposed to <br /> be assessed for the improvements as required per Minnesota State Statute Chapter 429. Attached is a copy of the <br /> Assessment Hearing notice mailed to residents. <br /> Anoka County requires that assessments be certified to the County Auditor by November 30th for collection on next <br /> year's taxes. This deadline will be met by conducting the Assessment Hearing on October 25th. <br /> Observations/Alternatives: <br /> Observations: <br /> Proposed Final Assessments <br /> The final proposed assessment amount for this project is$950.00 per each of the three (3)benefiting properties, <br /> which totals$2,850. Each of the properties proposed to be assessed has direct access to the improved segment of <br /> Sunwood Drive. <br /> The proposed final assessment amount is intended to recover 25%of eligible project costs once pro-rated for each <br /> of the residential properties. This cost was arrived at by dividing 25%of the project costs across an equivalent <br /> number of residential properties along the project corridor. This assessment rate was then compared to the final <br /> assessment rate levied for the 2015 overlay improvements which totaled$728.90 per property (the 2015 project did <br /> not include a full width mill which adds significant cost to the project),which appeared to be very comparable. <br /> Since each property proposed to be assessed received the same level of benefit the proposed assessment rate was <br /> applied equally to each using the"per lot"assessment method as allowed per the City's adopted Special <br /> Assessment Policy. The proposed special assessments conform to the requirements set forth in State Statute Chapter <br /> 429, chapter 8 of the City Charter,applicable City code, and the City's adopted Special Assessments Policy,which <br /> are attached to this case for reference. <br /> Attached are copies of the final assessment map and roll for this project. The proposed final assessment amount is <br /> the same assessment amount preliminarily approved by Council on April 12,2016. <br /> All work has been completed. Staff is working with the contractor to determine final construction costs,which will <br /> be presented in detail at the time Council is requested to approve final payment. Final project costs are estimated to <br /> be $233,000 which includes indirect costs for administration, engineering, finance and legal fees estimated at 14% <br /> of construction costs. <br /> A special benefit consultation report was not completed for this project due to the small number of identified <br /> benefiting properties and the minimal amount of special assessments proposed to be collected. <br /> The proposed interest rate for special assessments is 3.75%, and assessments are proposed to carry a 10 year term. <br /> The attached hearing notice includes a schedule of payment showing annual payments including principal and <br /> interest. <br /> No assessment deferrals have been requested or are proposed with this project. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Prior to the April 12th Improvement Hearing only one property owner proposed to be assessed for the <br /> improvements contacted staff,but after providing additional information to this property owner regarding the <br /> proposed assessment there was no further contact. At the time this report was written,no additional comments <br />