My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Resolution - #16-10-189 - 10/11/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Resolutions
>
2016
>
Resolution - #16-10-189 - 10/11/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2025 2:13:10 PM
Creation date
11/28/2016 12:22:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions & Ordinances
Resolutions or Ordinances
Resolutions
Resolution or Ordinance Number
#16-10-189
Document Date
10/11/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8) That the plight is not created by the Applicant. <br />9) That, if granted, the Variance will not alter the locality's essential character. <br />10) That, if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br />property. <br />11) That, if granted, the variance will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited in <br />the applicable zoning district. <br />12) That, if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase the congestion on the public <br />street. <br />13) That, if granted, the variance will not adversely impact the degree of public health, safety <br />and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. <br />14) That, if granted, the variance will not diminish established property values within the <br />neighborhood. <br />15) That, if granted, the variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish <br />the intended purpose of the Applicant. <br />16) That the unique circumstances on the Subject Property do not result from the actions of the <br />Applicant. <br />17) That, if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is <br />denied to the owners of other land in the same district. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Van Scoy, and upon <br />vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />Chairperson Levine <br />Commissioner Bauer <br />Commissioner Van Scoy <br />Commissioner Brauer <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />Commissioner Andrusko <br />Commissioner Nosan <br />and the following abstained: <br />None <br />Resolution #16-10-183 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.