Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by O~cilm~ber Cox and eeoonded by ~ryor l~ei~an to table this came <br />u~til Co~cilTm regular meeting schedul~ for Sune 25, 1985. <br /> <br />Motion carried. ¥otin~ Yes: Ma¥o~ Hei~nan, O~uncilmanbers Sorteberg, Oox, <br />Reimann and Sch/ueter. Voting No:' Nome. <br /> <br />_Regu_ est For Variance Fr~m Platting_ Regu_ irements Of ~k~divisi~n <br /> Chapter~ Case Of Mr. And Mrs. John Brolsma: <br /> <br />Mrs. Brolsma was present. <br /> <br />Motion by Gouncilmsnber Gox and sebonded by (buncilm~nter Sorteberg to approve <br />Mr. and Mrs. Brolsma's request for a variance from the platting requirements of <br />the subdivision chapter with the provision that ordinances do not presently <br />allow for a building permit to be issue on that p~operty. <br /> <br />Motion carried. ¥otin9 Yes: Mayor Heitman, G~uncilm~nbers Sorteberg, Gox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: Nome. ~ <br /> <br />Q~%9_[4~ Requ_ est For Preliminary_ P.U.D. _A~_roval: Case Of North Fork. <br /> Inc. (Oontinued) .. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the proposed resolution for preliminary and <br />final plat approval on Northfork should be revised as follows: <br /> <br />Replace language in Ite~ %2.c with: '~at there be an agreement for the <br />financial responsibility relating to Ramsey's and applicant's share of <br />improvements to Jarvis Street adjacent to the subject plat.' <br /> <br />Add It~ ~2.e: '~at the plat may not be filed until the P.U.D. zoning <br />ordinance is effective. ~at the developer is advised that any on-site <br />improvers, nfs ~onstructed prior to filing the plat will be made at it's <br />own risk. ' <br /> <br />Gouncilmember ~.hlueter recalled that there was some doubt as to the <br />buildability of ~o of the lots. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that one lot will be filled and the lot line of the other <br />lot has been extended in order to provide more buildable soil area. <br /> <br />Gouncilmamber Schlueter inquired as to the status of the City's request for <br />access across Burlington Northern Railroad crossing. <br /> <br />Mr. ~le stated that the request for acoess across Burlington Northern has <br />been withdrawn; with the revised plat there is no need for public acoess across <br />the crossing. <br /> <br />fbuncilma~er Schlueter n~ted that the developers will be using the crossing in <br />their marketing process and the crossing is intended to be used in emergency <br />situations. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that it will be the developer's responsibility to restrict <br />access; that acoess will only be opened up to the public in an emergency <br /> June 11, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 9 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />