My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 10/06/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2016
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 10/06/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:31:46 PM
Creation date
12/2/2016 9:52:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
10/06/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Wait to see what happens with PACT Charter School—if they end up buying a portion of <br /> the former Legacy Christian Academy property. PACT charter only needs a portion of <br /> the former Legacy Christian Academy site (about half). If the PACT Charter purchase <br /> took place, the City could pick up about 40 acres of the remaining land for the business <br /> park. NOTE: the former Legacy Christian Academy site is owned by Hageman Holdings. <br /> UPDATE:PACT Charter School has indicated they have made a site selection for their <br /> new school campus—that being the Legacy Christian Academy site. Fora number of <br /> reasons, they are unable to make that decision final, and enter into a formal purchase <br /> agreement, until at least fall cf 2017. Likely, closing would occur sometime in 2018. This <br /> is the best-case scenario for PACT from a timing perspective. As a result, counting on <br /> this action to occur is speculative at this point. <br /> D. If developers are not interested, and PACT Charter doesn't get their deal done, staff <br /> should bring back a future discussion about potentially considering a City purchase. <br /> Staff is concerned the upfront cost-benefit of considering a city purchase of the Pearson <br /> property is diminishing, considering the purchase price is now nearly double what was <br /> originally contemplated. <br /> • In order for the City to purchase the Pearson property now, we would need to <br /> come up with$1,465,501 (about$30,000 per acre or$0.75 psf). <br /> • Originally, the City discussed a price of roughly$800,000(about$18,000 per acre <br /> or$0.41 psf). <br /> • In order to get arterial infrastructure completed, the City estimated a$31,000 <br /> cost per acre(about$.075 psf or$1,393,000 for the Pearson 48 acres). <br /> • Therefore, if the city were to purchase the Person property now(48 acres), and <br /> install arterial infrastructure, we'd be looking at an investment of about <br /> $2,858,000, $63,600 per acre, or$1.46 psf. That price does not include holding <br /> costs, time-value of money, internal site infrastructure, etc. <br /> • We believe the asking price for industrial land is roughly$2.00-$2.50 psf. <br /> However, it is very common for the City to sell property at the low end of the <br /> market, or even with a subsidy(i.e. $1.00-$1.75 psf). <br /> • The EDA has about$2.1M available(between the County EDA/HRA, EDA fund, <br /> and EDA RLF). We would need to pull dollars from other sources in order to <br /> make this project work. NOTE:this is a departure from the original discussion— <br /> which assumed the EDA would have enough dollars to cover. <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.