Laserfiche WebLink
Acting Chairman Lichter asked about the kind and width of alignments the trails <br />would be. Mr. Otto responded that he recommends a 60 foot vide easement. <br /> <br />Dennis Peck stated that Northfork has no objection to any of the proposed park <br />alternatives, but that North Fork, Inc. has the following concerns: <br /> <br />1 - The developers would like to plat the second phase and they need the <br />Park Commission's recommendation before the Council viii give final plat <br />approval. <br />2 - North Pork, Inc. understood that the park dedication was to be cash <br />for all the phases; a land dedication is workable, but they need to know <br />the Commission's plans for alignments. The developers are also concerned <br />about maintaining the rights of the homeowners with the trail system, <br />estimated time of development of the trails, and the uses of the trails. <br /> <br />Notion by Commissioner Lokker and seconded by Commissioner Rustad to recommend <br />Alternative 13 as the alignment for park dedication for ~orthfork P.U.D. <br />Commissioner Hetland stated that he didn't have the expertise to make such a <br />recommendation. Acting Chairman Lichter replied that the developers needed <br />direction from the Commission for future phases of the development; trails <br />would be multiple purpose. The motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Case ~3: Review Ken Johnson's Provosed Plat of Autumn Meadows Regarding <br /> Park Dedication Requirements <br /> <br />The Co~mission reviewed Mr. Johnson's proposed plat north of Autumn Heights and <br />determined that if they were to expand the park in Autumn Heights, ti would be <br />from County Road 83. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Hetland and seconded by Commissioner Looyen to recommend <br />that the Council require a fee to satisfy the park dedication requirements for <br />Ken Johnson's plat of Autumn Meadows. Notion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Case ~4: Review Paul Johnson's Request Regarding Park Land Acquisition <br /> <br />The Commission reviewed Mr. Johnson's request regarding acquiring land on <br />Germanium Street N.W. for development as a neighborhood park. The Commission <br />felt that neighborhood parks and ball fields are difficult to maintain. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Looyen and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to thank Mr. <br />Johnson for his suggestion but that the Commission has no interest in a park in <br />that area. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Case ~5: Discussion Regarding Joint Park Commission/Planning Commission <br /> Meeting on August 26. 1986 <br /> <br />The Commission noted the joint Park Commission/Planning Commission meeting on <br />August 26, 1986. <br /> <br />Notion by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Hetland to adjourn <br />the meeting. The motion carried unanimously and the meeting was adjourned at <br />8:30 p,m, <br /> <br /> <br />