Laserfiche WebLink
' dal~s (From Page 1).. increment (From Page 2) <br /> <br />sells revenue bonds to finance the Jail. <br />In this type of financing, the County <br />Board can wear two "hats"; as they <br />serve as both directors of the Issuer <br />corporation and as county board members. <br />The County enters Into a year-to-year <br />lease for the term of the financlng. <br /> <br />CertlfJcates of Par~lc]~;Latlon~ This <br />method Is similar to the "63-20" form of <br />lease-revenue flnanclng, but it does not <br />require the creation of a non-profit <br />corporation. The project Is financed <br />through the sale of certificates of <br />partlclpatlon In the lease. This option <br />carries .more risk for the Investor and <br />consequently results in a higher rate of <br />Interest. <br /> <br />Regardless of the financing technique <br />chosen for your project the flnanclal <br />advisor is an Important part of the <br />project team. The financial advisor can <br />help you answer the crucial questions <br />surrounding the financing of a Jail: <br /> <br />Whlch financing alternatlve is best <br />suited to your situation? <br /> <br />· How can project financlng be structured <br /> to best fit the needs of the County? <br /> <br />· What are the tax Impacts of project <br /> financing? <br /> <br />· What is the most effective approach to <br /> a referendum? <br /> <br />· How do you sollclt and negotiate lease <br /> f Inancing packages? <br /> <br />Public Financial Systems' quallficatlons <br />to assist your organizatlon In financing <br />a jail facllity are unmatched. PFS <br />brings knowledge of Jail financing that <br />can only be gained from experience. We <br />are currently working on ten jail <br />projects throughout this region. These <br />projects run the full range of design <br />options and project f inanclng. This <br />possible resources to your project]. <br /> <br />do not have to coordinate the key <br />elements of the project between several <br />flrms, This approach also keeps costs <br />to a minimum, You are not paylng two <br />firms to do the same thing, <br /> <br />Perhaps the greatest advantage of the <br />PFS approach Is that your plan wlll be <br />financially feasible. The most common <br />weakness of tax increment financing is <br />the fallure of the plans to be based on <br />an accurate analysls of the flnanclal <br />potential. The inabil ity of a community <br />to finance planned projects with the tax <br />Increment that will be generated creates <br />some very difficult decisions. Public <br />Financial Systems helps you avoid these <br />s ituatlons. <br /> <br />Let Publlc'Flnanclal Systems bring our <br />Innovative and technlcalty sound <br />approach to tax Increment flnanclng to <br />your community. , <br /> <br />UNSTEADY RISE IN BORROWING PREDICTED <br /> <br />A recent report from Citicorp Information <br />Services suggest that borrowing by state <br />and local government will follow an <br />unsteady path In the coming years. The <br />report, entitled "United States Economic <br />Forcast 1984-89 Quarterly Revlew," <br />suggests that the net flows of state and <br />local borrowing will rise slowly over <br />the next few years, before dropping off. <br />near the end 'of the decade. This trend <br />would Increase the amount of outstanding <br />debt over the next few years, but return <br />to 1984 levels by 1989. Interest rates <br />on long term municipal debt, according <br />to the report, are predlcted to Increase <br />150 basis points over the next year. <br /> <br />The Citlcorp report also forecasts a <br />rapid rlse In state and local spendlng. <br />The level of spending Is projected to <br />Increase by 44% between 1984 and 1989. <br />T~e 1989 ~igure would be almost double <br />the amount of spending In 1979. <br />Increased spending on publ lc works, <br />education, and economic development are <br />cited as major factors In the spending <br />growth. <br /> <br /> <br />