Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> <br /> i <br /> <br />POLICY POSITIONS <br /> <br /> which is not experience ruled, and <br /> return Id thc .~ate tax. which is e×pe <br /> fiance rated <br /> <br />2 ~e cu~ent unempk~enl compen <br /> ~tic>n ~nOfi~ le~J$ should <br /> ze~ unti) the ~c'm <br /> <br />3. Op~ any unempl <br /> ~tion lox hikes ~lhoul fim~menml <br /> chon~s In occes$1o <br />~. U~emplo~oRl com~n~auon ~es <br /> should ~ moro ex~nce <br /> <br />5. ~e occessbllIWlost for access to the <br /> unempl~en[ com~uon <br /> should ~ <br />6. Pe~t~-fime~e~ should <br /> n~ ~ allowed acce~ to unemploy- <br /> ment ~m~mmtion ~nefits <br /> <br />7. WO~ ~reh r~ulrements should <br /> ~ lightened with N~ibilJ~ of work <br /> ~ verifimtion cenifimtes initiated. <br /> <br />8. Su~obl~ wo~ defin~ion should <br /> c~n~ ~th ~ible "sliding ~e" <br /> initiat~ ~ ~e duration of ~nefit <br /> <br />9. ~1 wooer ~ond~rds should <br /> ~ In~ with ~ree yes "~c~ng' <br /> m~h~Lsm ~blished <br /> <br />B. Visual Display lermlnals (VDT) <br /> 1. Attempts to regulate the manufac- <br /> ture and use of visual display terminals <br /> should be opposed. Attempts to <br /> develop governmental standards <br /> for V.D,T, use in the busine~/o~ce <br /> setting should bi) opposed. <br /> <br />C. Workers' Componsalion <br /> <br />I. Leave the 1983 re/¢~rm and 198,i clean- <br /> up legislation in place until 1986 when <br /> comprehensive resulm can be properly <br /> mea.~u~ed Continue to monitor cost <br /> and beneflls wtlh spock::l empha- <br /> sis on Minnesota's competitiveness <br /> with surrounding states for premium <br /> cos[& <br /> <br />2. Promote legislative scruliny of the <br /> workers' compensation Speoiol <br /> <br />3. Oppose proposed legislation <br /> (6/4/84) which elimlnaies cop on <br /> modlcal <br />4. Opposo proposed Jegk,~lati(m { 6/4/84) <br /> Incroasing ecxmomic reccree~.., com. <br /> pensation and impairment compePe <br /> ,~:::fion Dy ct flat { 0% on both benefit <br /> tables. <br /> <br />D. LA. BO.~/MANGI:MEN! PERENNIALS <br /> <br />1. OppoSe auempts to pa.~s plant clos- <br />Ing legislation in Minnesota <br />2. Oppose anempts to pa.~s successor <br />Iogislotlon in Minnesota. <br />3. Oppose aRempt~ to pa.ss strikebreak- <br /> er' 18glsl$ion Jn Minne,sc~,2 Conlinued <br /> <br />POLICY POSITIONS <br /> <br />VI, HEALTH CARE COSTS/ <br /> EMPLOYEE BENEFITS/ <br /> INSURANCE <br />~Jl~-~u-~ ~.' I ',' · -. <br />A. Suppo~l mandatoD' seat b~lt usage <br /> legislation <br /> <br />B. Oppose state mandated employee <br /> benefits. <br /> <br />C. Prohibit punitive damages awards in <br /> cml actions. <br />D. Amendthe insurance p~ovisions affecting <br /> moloro/cJes and mandate heimel <br /> usage. <br />E. Oppose state welfare reimbursement <br /> formula,~ which shift health care cost <br /> burdensto non-governmental poyors. <br />F, Oppose government regulation of <br /> health care industry. <br /> <br />Minnesota Assodatlon of SecJ Sec( <br />Commerce & lndu~.ry~P~ <br />480 Cedar <br />300 Hanover Building <br />.ca. Paul. Minnesota 55101 <br /> <br />NEWSPAPER <br /> IMPORTANT DATED <br /> MATERIAL <br /> <br />PLEASE DO NOT DELAY <br /> <br /> <br />