Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Rei~nn and ~chlueter. Voting No: No.ne. <br /> <br />(This case should have been carried over from the Ma~ch 26, 1985 Council <br />agenda hot inadvertently was not.) <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that he is not in favor of any Federal program, but if we <br />have to keep one, this is the one to keep. <br /> <br />Counciln~nber Schlueter referred to the resolution proposed and stated that <br />she doesn't feel that it is a~proprlate to name the Federal programs that <br />Ramsey is not in favor of as scme other cities might favor those programs. <br /> <br />Councilm~nber Cox stated that Federal Revenue Sharing is one of Ramsey's <br />opportunities to 9et sc~e of it's tax dollars back and it is the most <br />efficient of the Federal programs. Councilm~ber Cox stated that he would <br />like to have some o~mments in the resolution regarding Ramsey being supportive <br />of the Federal Government reducing the budget and the taxing of the people; <br />with tax reduction the City oould keep and designate the spending of it's c~n <br />dollars. <br /> <br />Council unanimously oonsented to dispense with the reading of the resolution. <br /> <br />Motion ky Councilm~Tfer Cox and seoonded ky Councilm~nter Reimann to adopt <br />Resolution $85-74 supporting the Federal revenue sharing program with It~ ~1 <br />to be amended in a way that will express Ramsey's opiruion that tax reduction <br />is a first priority it~; that if a Federal program must be preserved, <br />preserve Federal revenue sharing. (Please refer to resolution file for <br />Resolution $85-74). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmambers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Rei~ann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />E. Setting Minimum Standards And Assessment Procedures For I]rb~n And Rural <br /> ~reas - <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Heitman and seconded by Council~.~mber Reimann to table this <br />case until the next regular or specia/ Council meeting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor }{eitman, Councilm~mber Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case 91: Engineering (continued) <br /> <br />D. Consideration Of Storm Draina_oe Improvements In Pineview Estates <br /> Unplatted - <br /> <br />Mr. Dale McKnight suk~nitted a petition to Council from area residents opposing <br />the storm drainage improvement project. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seoonded by Councilmenber Reimann to receive <br />the petition opposing Resolution ~85-56 for proposed storm drainage <br /> April 9, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 9 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />