My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
09/11/85
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1985
>
09/11/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2025 11:42:30 AM
Creation date
7/26/2004 11:46:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
09/11/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(DmcLlme~ber COx stated that there were 5 signatuxe~ on the petition foz an <br />investigation and 5 com¢ilpersons made the decision to approve the <br />investigation; the $500 investigation {Dst mhould be divided ~qually ~m3ng <br />those 10 persons. <br /> <br />Mr. Fountain stated that if the (Dst is divided the way Comcilm~ber (]ox <br />suggests, he will withdr~ his contribution. <br /> <br />Motion by Gouncilmmber Cox and seconded by (buncilm~ber Reimann that the cost <br />of the special investigation ($500) be divided equally ~ong the 5 petitioners <br />and the 5 oouncilpersons. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mayor Bei~m~an inquired as to how this motion could be <br />enforced. Mr. ~le stated that the City does have the funds to cover the <br />cost of the investigation; if these 10 people pay the cost, it would be a <br />voluntary action. (Duncilmember Schlueter stated that the cost of the <br />investigation would be taken out of the City's General funds, which is taxpayer <br />dollars, to which she has contributed her fair share. (Duncilme~ber (Dx noted <br />that there are taxpayers that did not want to pay for the investigation that <br />would be paying for it through the City's General Fund. <br /> <br />Motion c~rried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hei~an, (Duncilm~bers Sorteberg, (Dx and <br />Reimann. Voting No: Councilmember Schlueter. <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Request For Conditional Use Permit For Bc~e OccuDation~ oa~ Of Nr., <br /> <br />Mr. Schrm/le stated that Mr. Ness is requesting a conditiorml use permit to <br />operate a home improv~ent business frcm bis residence; the City has never <br />granted a permit for this type of use before. <br /> <br />Mr. Ness stated that there will be no advertising sign placed on his property. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman inquired if the permit would be transferrable to future property <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich replied that State statute will not all~ a City to deny <br />transferrin9 a conditional use permit to ensuing property owners. <br /> <br />Motion by (Duncilm~ber Reimann to adopt the Findings of Fact 0119 for Mr. <br />Donald Ness' request for a conditional use permit for a hc~e occupation. <br />Please refer to findings of fact file for Findings of Fact 0119. <br /> <br />Further Discussion.. Mr. Goodrich stated that City Council bas to adopt a <br />findings of fact consistent with what Council's decision will be. <br /> <br />(Duncilma~ber Re/mann withdrew his motion to adopt the findings of fact and <br />Council proceeded to review and Mend the findings. <br /> <br />Mr. Ness stated that he is a subcontractor and his jobs come to h'im by I~hone; <br />he has no ~mpl~yees that would be c~ming to his hc~e and the acoessory <br /> August 9.7, 1985 <br /> <br />~cje 20 o~ 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.