Laserfiche WebLink
I that individual ~ays that city oouncLle c~n give polioe c~ie~s the pc~e~ to <br /> issue gambling pe~mit~. Pm. Good:ich stated that a~te: m £eeeaxch he <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />B. .Vac~tion Of Old c.S.A.B. ~5 In Front Of ~ord Of n~fe Lutheran Church: <br /> <br />OouncL1 ~oted introduction of Ordinance %85-12 vacatin~ old C.S.A.H. %5 right- <br />of-way p~operty in front of Lord of Life Lutheran Chur(mh. <br /> <br />Motion by (buncilmm~ber (]ox and seconded by Oouncilm~mber Reimann to s~hedule <br />a lm_,b] ic hearing for September 10, 1985 regarding the vacating of C.S.A.H. %5 <br />right-of-way p~oper ty. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Gouncilme~bers Sorteberg, (bx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No~ Nome. <br /> <br />Oo~cilme~ber Gox thanked County (km~issioner Haas for getting Oounty <br />assistanoe in the Waltek situation with MPCA. <br /> <br />~ Request For Off-Sale Liouor License~ Case Of Mr. Geor_,e Wilcox: <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich stated that State 1~ allows for 12 off-sale lig r licenses in <br />~smsey; city ~dinanoe limits the Cit~ to 2 ~ff-sale liquor licenses. ~. <br />Wiloox is applying for a liquor license at Disoount 10, which is (xmrently <br />vacant. (buncil can Qhoose to disregard that building and advertise that <br />Ramsey has 1 off-sale liquor license available. Mr. Goodrich stated that he is <br />of the opinion that Ramsey has an obligation to that vacant Disoount 10 <br />building and would be hard pressed to show a oourt that the City does not <br />intend to all~ off-sale in that building. <br /> <br />Motion by Gouncilm~nber Oox and seoonded by Gouncilmmber Reimann to schedule a <br />public hearin9 for September 10 regarding Mr. Wilo~x' application for an off- <br />sale liquor lioense at Disoount <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mayor ~eitman inquired if this action would set a <br />precedenoe. Mr. Goodrich replied but it lxobahly would but he has seen cases <br />where existing uses esau_hi ish Ixiority. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor }{eitman, (bmcilmsmbers Sorteberg, Oox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Case %7: Discussion Regarding Requ_ est Fr~m Mr. And Mrs. Joseph Stack: <br /> <br />Mr. Stack was present and requested that the City take o~er road easement <br />access fr~ ~o~ty Road %64 to 181st Avenue N~ as there are ~ two other hc~es <br />using the easement. Mr. Stack stated that the building inspector told him that <br />City (bdes says that if more than one house is using the road, it has to be a <br />p;h~ ic ea~ent. <br /> <br />(buncil informed Mr. Stack that the City cannot take (wet the street u~til it <br />is brought up to City Gode and that would involve either the 3 property owners <br /> August 27, 1985 <br /> <br />Pacje 25 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />