Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />l <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I,Ir. Ramon Burton <br />July 12, ]985 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Waste Inventory <br /> <br />PACE Laboratories, Inc. with the assistance of Waltek, Inc. personnel <br />conducted an inventory of all waste generated at Waltek, Inc. This <br />inventory identified a total of 2 hazardous wastes and 4 non-hazardous <br />wastestreams. The hazardous wastestreams identified at Waltek, Inc. <br />uere: 1 } Sodium hydroxide sludge 2) Freon waste 2) Hydroflouric <br />acid/Nitric acid waste. The non-hazardous wastestreams included grinding <br />residue, wheelobrator residue, shell waste, and oil waste. · <br /> <br />Sodium Hydroxide Sludge - Currently there are 21 55 gallon drums, l0 35 <br />gallon drums and l0 l0 gallon drums of sodium hydroxide sludge stored <br />on-site at Waltek, Inc. All drums are open head and appear to be full. <br />The amount of water in ti~ese drums varies from being rock hard to <br />slightly moist. Attached to this letter is our report of laboratory <br />analysis of the sodium hydroxide sludge. Representative samples of the <br />sludge were collected by PACE Laboratories, Inc. from a randomly selected <br />number of the drums. The analysis shows that the only hazardous property <br />exibited by the sodium hydroxide sludge is its pH of 13. This high pH <br />classifies sodium hydroxide sludge as being corrosive. We have completed <br />a Rollins Environmental Permit Application form for disposal of the <br />sodium hydroxide sludge at a permitted hazardous waste landfill. This <br />form needs to be reviewed by Waltek, Inc. and if acceptable signed and <br />forwarded to: <br /> <br />Mr. Gene Jameson <br />Waste Research and Reclamation Company <br />Route 7 <br />Eau Claire, WI <br /> <br />~ased upon our preliminary discussions with Rollins Environmental it <br />appears tliat the sodium hydroxide s}udge would have to be repackaged in <br />55 gallon drums or 85 gallon over packs prior to off site shipment. <br />liowever, there are two other potential options for disposal of this waste <br />ulrich are; on s~te neutralization and discharge to either the drain field <br />,~f tl~e sanitary sewer system; or identifing another ~ndus~ry that can use <br />~.~e w~s~e as a product in a .~;as~e exchange. <br /> <br />[he feasibility of on-s~te neutralization of the sodium t~ydroxide sludge <br />~ou]d ~lave to be weighed against its cost verses off-site transportation <br />to a disposal facility and the ability to discharge the resulting <br />neutralized ~aste~./ater stream to either your drain field or to the An~ka <br />Sanitary Sewer System. Ti~is option should only be considered if the <br />:/aste excl~ange concept cannot i~e realized. We would recommend that a <br />pilot study be performed on the soOium hydroxide sludge to determine the <br />,]~}st for neutralizing and ti~e feasiblity for discharging the treated <br />;.,-te,.,/qter into ~i~- ......... drain fi,~l,'l r~ .~o,~/m Sanitar,/~ ..... qe:~r c,~y~,t_m,:l... <br /> <br /> <br />