Laserfiche WebLink
Jim Lasher of LSA Design, Inc. explained he will be reviewing a Document that has been put <br />together to summarize recent discussions between representatives of Ramsey Town Center, LLC <br />and the City of Ramsey. The last meeting between Ramsey Town Center, LLC and the City <br />resulted itl direction to look at amending the Master Development Agreement for purposes of <br />releasing thc benchmarks to allow the Developer to be able to move forward with residential <br />pieces of' the development. The Document that has been drafted is not a binding agq'eement and <br />anything within this Document can be changed. If an agreement is met Mayor Gamec and the <br />Developer may sign the Document stating that they generally agree. The City's legal counsel <br />would be directed to prepare the proposed amendments to the existing City of Ramsey Master <br />Development Agreement for Ramsey Town Center and Allocation Agreements for the City <br />Council's and the Developer's consideration. The amendment of the agreement will require a <br />vote by the City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Lashcr reviewed items one and two of the Document concerning the General Business Tenns <br />and Conditions of tile Developers Agreement Amendment Proposal to RTC, LLC. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamcc inquired about the amounts associated with Chapter 429. <br /> <br />Mr. Lasher replied 20 percent of the Phase I and Phase II roads are being assessed. The <br />ordinance in place includes a five year maximum term. RTC would like this to be extended to 15 <br />years, which is fairly standard in the market place. When the term is extended it reduces the cost <br />on each square foot every year. The basic premise is to spread cost over a larger area. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook questioned if staying within the five years and spreading the cost over the <br />whole area al'fccts the marketability and puts a burden on the residential area. <br /> <br />Mi'. Lasher replied most likely the housing portion of the assessment will be paid in cash at <br />closing, and the commercial portion will extend out. <br /> <br />Mr. Lasher reviewed item three of the Document. He stressed that the original Master <br />Development Agreement included a levy of six million dollars of special assessments against the <br />Development Property to partially finance the City's construction of the AUAR roadway <br />improvements. The Developer is now asking to cap this at three million dollars. He cannot <br />identify any source to replace the three million dollars at this time. The City does, however, have <br />security in owning the land. He advised the housing will not push the AUAR improvements as <br />quickly as the connnercial development would, due to commercial development generating much <br />more traffic than housing. <br /> <br />Councihncmber Elvig stated the traffic mitigation portion of the AUAR indicated that 33 percent <br />of the building, whether it is housing or commercial, would push some of the regional issues. <br /> <br />Councihncmber Kurak noted whoever purchases the property and starts building housing will <br />need infi;astructure. She questioned if the assessments coming off the sale of the property would <br />go towards paying for those improvements. She stated there will need to be discussion regarding <br />this issue. <br /> <br />City Council/June 29, 2004 <br /> Page 3 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />