Laserfiche WebLink
~ke ~} s~ ~et ~ i~ ~e~nt repre~n~ ~ ~r~r~ip ~at <br />~r~ip In ~e 1~ fo~rly ~ ~ ~r~ ~1~ ~o~r~ ~ <br />~r~se ~ni~t t~ ~ ~e~nt · ~~ r~l~ of ~elo~nt ~o~ for <br /> <br />~. ~t~ pre~ ~ ~rl~ ~ of ~e ~5~t 1241 ~cre ~r~l ~ variom <br /> <br /> ~, ~ir s~ ~t ~e ~elo~rs are at~i~ ~ ~vi~ for <br /> <br /> tt will ~ w~in ~ future ~. ~e <br /> 1243 acr~; t31 ~cr~ of lo~, 252 sidle f~ily ~lli~s, avera~ lot size <br /> of 2.5 acr~, 50 acr~ of ri~t~f~,, 560 acr~ of o~n s~, 100 ecre <br /> <br /> in ~is ~~, <br /> <br /> ~at hi~ offi~ ~ ~~ vii ~T ~r~i~ ~ ~1~ cr~si~ <br /> <br /> [ail~6, tt i~ likely ~at ~e ~t will ~ ~r~t~. <br /> Wi~.~m~t <br /> <br />given those 3-5 lot~ affected t,~ the Cla~s 3 soi]~ on the property. <br /> <br />(beznissioner Deter statefl ~at be realizes the 9fade crossin9 alreao'y <br />but the developer ovuld give s~e ~nsideration bo the underI~s that <br />as a cattle crossing. #ith regar/ts bo aensity0 C~s~ioner Dc-~er stated <br />that ~aybe it can be taken into oonsideration thai: ~ proposer develotzent <br />will nbut · si~lar develol~ent of 2-1/2 acre lot sizes in Sberburne <br />~hich is not tmcler P~ro T~8 Planning Act jurisdiction. <br /> <br />City ~ngineer Paatikka stated that openir8 the door to this develolzw, nt o~ul <br />lea8 to ~r~ir8 ~ Ozprebensive Plan ar~ openir~ the entire City bo <br />~evelol~p-nt. <br /> <br />~bere was some/iscussion regardirzj recollections of back in 1981 or 1~2, ! <br />City rezoni.~ the mt~ject property to Rural Open ~p~c~ ar~ 6eneral P. ill~" <br />e~jection bo that act/on. <br /> <br />Pit. l~aatlkka stated ttmt the process b~ ~ bhe (lc~prelmnsive Plan tz not <br />very irreolved as 1on9 as the ~_ndnent does not have m~ affect on servic~ <br />like se~r capacity. <br /> <br />(kmnisston req~zted that for the Piannin9 ar~ Sonir8 February meetirs, Sta <br /> <br /> <br />