02/05/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I tha~ th~ ~)or Jt~ of cor~e~n l~ I~ res~rictAor~ o~ thi~ I Pit. i'uster stated that he viii be m~etin~ with IINR on F~i~', J~ ~is~ ~e ~iU tss~. ~:. ~s~ s~t~ ~mt five yemrm ~ ~titton ~ z~o~ ~e ~o~ ~ ~~ in a liifer~t ~r~on. ~r s~ ~at ~e stt~tion ~ it ~is~ ~ ~t ~ fair. ~o~ ~ ~ ~et ~e ~'m ~ni~ ~ui~~. ham - 371 {;Uoldi~e - Inquired as to tt~ height of the units vbett~r or not the tr~.s betm~een the subject property anO residenoe~ on Cuolid~e will be ldt as a buffer. (~r. issioner De~r state0 that the developer is restrictefl to a 35' saxi~ buildin~ height above the m~an 9rounfl level. Pa. Foster state~ that the ~its are prOl~Sed to be 2-1/2 story; about strip of ~ will ~t ~ distu~; ~ ~. ~a~'s ~ keel, ~i~ 2~ on ~e s~j~t ~o~r~, ~11 m~ ~ly ~t ~ distu~. Pa. l~oster stated that it ha~ been requested that ~ reoonsi6er the ~ount c property taken for Wild ar~ Soenic-area; in most azeas, 400' vas taken; also request, i~m9 IINR reconsider the ~tmt of property taken on & parcel just tO t~ north of this subject property. N~lly Ore, eau stated that the tssm of pervious surfaoe cover might also be a problem. Oumaission o~nsensus is table preli~!nary plat aptxoval mmtil ~ and developers of River's Bend Properties resolve the density and pervious surf& probl~us. City Plarmer Arae Rorris provide0 wpies of pro~ resolutions regardi~ l~'y'~ support of ~ Center Partnership in their att~pt~ to develop densities speeifie~ in City Or0inanc~ ar~ ~'s request that ~ re0eli~ bo~c~£ie~ of Soenic Rive~ Lancl Ose Districts. t~l~ Stine of ~ stat. eft that ~ trill vie~ ~ r~lu~o~ ~ ~t ~ ti~h never reoorded, to 9rant approval to the propose~ develo~t. ~ I resolutions ~oult be sub~itt~ to ~ Omni, al ~fice ~s background -~t~rial Wotlou {my Oumuissioner l~:;uer ax] seou~ by $iss~ra~_n r~n9 that (lumcil adopt resolutions rc~a~ lm~'m support of {musey (~nter