My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
06/04/85
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
06/04/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:56:06 PM
Creation date
7/30/2004 2:27:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
06/04/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />interest p~yments during that interim period from project initiation to <br />the first tax reoeipts, the city may have to increase the size of the bond <br />issue for capitalized interest. <br /> <br />Bob Muller stated that he is oonsidering building a strip center in an area of <br />Ramsey for which public imp~ov~ents are not planned and inquired as to how <br />tax incr~nent financing would benefit his situation. <br /> <br />Ms. Waelti stated that in Mr. Muller's case, tax incr~ent financing could be <br />used for lighting, signage, landscaping, sidewalks, public parking (or soil <br />prepsration for private parking), and grassy areas. <br /> <br />Council~nber Cox inquired as to how tax increment financing can be used for <br />public servioes such as a bridge crossing or YMCA facility, which would <br />attract development to a certain area. <br /> <br />Ms. Waelti replied that tax incr~ent financing could ~be used for a community <br />center that would be leased to the YMCA for instance. ~ne city cannot build a <br />building in which the city will conduct city business. <br /> <br />Councilmember (Dx inquired if the city can let funds acct~nulate and build a <br />community center a couple of years down the line. <br /> <br />Ms. Waelti replied that acc~ulating funds for future use is allowed but the <br />problem with waiting is that the community center may be needed at an earlier <br />time to ~ke the development project more viable. <br /> <br />Councilm~mber Schlueter inquired if there is a time limit on development of a <br />parcel in the tax incr~nent district. <br /> <br />Ms. Waelti replied that if nothing happens on a parcel in 4 years, the parcel <br />is dropped fr~ the tax increment district; if interest in the parcel occurs <br />after it's deletion, that parcel can be readmitted to the district. <br /> <br />Ms. Waelit also noted that economic development districts (for new <br />development) are set up for a time period of 8 years; tax increment districts <br />for commercial redevelopment and moderate income housing are set up for a time <br />period of 25 years. <br /> <br />Mr. Jack Ippel referred to Ms. Waelti's earlier comment regarding tax <br />increment financing running for as long as it take to pay for the public <br />improvements and inquired if that doesn't conflict with her statement <br />regarding redevelopment and housing being set up for 25 years. <br /> <br />Ms. Waelti replied that a tax increment project area can be set up for 25 <br />years; the tax incr~ent districts within the project area run for as long as <br />it takes to pay of the improvements to that specific area. <br /> <br />Council~-~ber Cox inquired if areas already with some development can be <br />included in tax increment districts. <br /> <br />Ms. Waelti replied that if there is ongoing construction, the parcel cannot be <br />captured and included in the tax increment district if the building permit was <br /> April 30, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.