Laserfiche WebLink
Zimmerman, LaDue, Hendriksen and ShLm%;ay. Voting No: None. <br />NOTE CITY CCUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />~e Commission noted the following: <br /> <br /> 1. Special City Council meeting minutes dated August 13, 1985. <br /> <br />QOMMI SSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case $1.. Request For Metes And Bounds Subdivision; Case Of Mr. Wil]~g~ <br /> <br />Mr. Lester Carlson was present representing Mr. Loucks. Mr. Loucks is <br />requesting a metes and bounds subdivision of 6 acres frc~ his 80 acre paroel to <br />give to his daughter and grandson; a legal description of this parcel was <br />drafted in 1983. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding a road easement being prcwided to the east and the <br />City not looking favorably upon metes and bounds subdivisions. <br /> <br />Motion by Oc~missioner Zimmerman and seconded by Cc, Pmissioner Dee~er to <br />reoc~end that Mr. Loucks proceed with a convenience plat and to not require <br />soil borings, percs and topographies; further, to recclTmend that a road <br />easement be provided for in the plat. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Ck~issioners Deemer, <br />Zimmerman, LaDue, Hendriksen and Sh~way. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Request For Concept Review Of Street Extensions: Case Of Nor~ <br /> <br />Motion by Chairman Peterson and seconded by ~_cc&~m_ issioner Dee~er to accept the <br />concept of 153rd alignment in Northfork P.U.D.; further, this motion does not <br />m~n acceptance of lot configurations, accesses or cul-de-sacs. <br /> <br />Motion failed. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, (kml~issioners LaDue and ~--~er. <br />Voting No: Cc~missioners Zi~merman, ShLm~ay and Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is that they are uncc~fortable with the proposed accesses <br />onto an MSA road; it is inconsistent with what has been approved in the past. <br /> <br />Case S3: Discussion Regarding Fence Reg_ulations; <br /> <br />(k~mission consensus is to revain with what has been written into Ramsey's <br />recodification of ordinances adding a clause regarding not obstructing traffic <br />visibility. <br /> <br />Case ~.- Discussion Regarding Draft Of Recodified Zonin_a Ordinance: <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding non-conforming ~ grandfathering; Mr. Goodrich <br />stated that the City cannot limit transferability. <br /> <br />September 3, 1985 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />