Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by and seconded b opt <br /> <br /> %85-__ ordering feasibility reports for sealcoattng projects <br /> in 1985. Please refer to resolution file for Resolutions <br /> <br /> Council discussion: <br /> <br /> Motion carried/failed. Voting yes . <br /> Voting no ...... . <br /> <br /> Ite~ E: ~eaue~t to Discuss Street _Grades at_the Intersection of <br /> _fbu~tv 1%3ad_~5 and .Azurttm ~tr~et <br /> <br /> Councilman Cox has requested that this item be brought forth for <br /> Council consideration. ~is is in fact a very hazardous intersection <br /> when the streets are icy inasmuch as the grade is Suite steep. <br /> Corrections would probably require extensive street grading and the <br /> of of driveways. A feasibility to determine <br /> changing <br /> a <br /> couple <br /> report <br /> the oost and appropriate method of financing would be in order. <br /> <br /> Enclosure (D2-i) contains the proposed resolution for your considera- <br /> tion. <br /> <br /> fbuncil Action: <br /> <br /> Your action will be to order a feasibility report for the street <br /> grade problem at the above intersection. Unanimous consensus of the <br /> Council is required to dispense with the reading of the proposed <br /> resolution. ~e following proposed motion is hereby submitted for <br /> your consideration~./~: ~~t <br /> Motion by~ and seconded by o adopt <br /> Resolution ~85-_ _ ordering a feasibility report for the <br />{ ~. street grade problem at the intersection of County Road ,5 and <br /> b Azurite Street NW. Please refer to resolution file for <br /> Resolution %85-__. <br /> <br /> Motion carried/failed. Voting yes <br /> Voting no ....... . <br /> <br /> Item F: Reauest to._Rpdefine thee;Rum River Scenic Ri.vet .]~ouDdarv <br /> Ac]jac~..t. ~ River's <br /> <br /> ~l~e owners/developers of River's Bend Properties and Ramsey' Center <br /> Partnership have requested our support in redefining the scenic river <br /> to the plat of River's Bend. The <br /> boundary <br /> adjacent <br /> development <br /> constraints placed on commercial properties in the river corridor <br /> are, in the opinion of the developer, excessively restrictive and <br /> make it economically unfeasible to develop. <br /> <br /> <br />