Agenda - Council - 02/26/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AARON G. HINTON /~shat. the Applicant has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance to construct a second residential structure on one / parcel of land. ~hat the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing on February 26, 1985, and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. ~hat the subject property is generally kn~n as the J.D. Soott farm at 7910 173rd Avenue N.W. and is located in the R-1 district. ~hat the subject property is approximately 7.5 acres in size. Shat the Applicant's request is to construct a second residential structure on the subject property. ~ere presently exists one residential structure and several accessory buildings on the northeast portion of the parcel. ~e Applicant is proposing to oonstruct the seoond residence on the southwest portion of the parcel. ~hat the City Ordinance allows only one residential structure on a parcel of land, except in the case of planned unit developments. ~hat the subject parcel has access from 173rd Avenue N.W. along its northern boundary. Shat there is access from Bison Street N.W. along the eastern boundary of the subject parcel. Shat there may be exceptional, unique or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district inasmuch as the existing dwelling is to be only temporarily occupied. Shat such variance may be necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity. She possibility of increased financial return shall not in itself be deemed sufficient to warrant a variance. However, in this case, this parcel will have only one residential dwelling unit in the future. Shat the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the intent or purpose of this ordinance or the public interest.