Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />cente~tne of St. F~ancl~ Boulevard I~.W. as ~easu~ed at right <br /> <br />eaJ~ center}ins of Bt. Fianci~ Boulevard N.M. to an intersection <br />with a ]the exten~e~ Northeasterly at ~ right angle to said <br />centezline from the ~tnt of begtnntngl thence Southwesterly to <br />~e ~tnt of beginning. ~xcepttn9 thereiro~ that part of which <br />t6 ~brsced within the pl~t of BROR ADDITION, according to maid <br />pl~t on file and of ~eco~d tn the office of the County Recorder, <br />Anoka ~unty, Minnesota, and the riparian rights, if ~ny, to said <br />pl~t. S~ject ~ St. F~ci~ ~ulevard H.~. <br /> <br />{%lso that part of said Government Lot 3 described as follows: <br />Beginning at the above referenced point 'B'; thence southwesterly <br />along the extension of the above referencec] line 'C' o its <br />intersection with said centerline of Bt. Francis Boulevard <br />thence southeasterly along said centerline to an intersection <br />with a line parallel with and distant 66.00 feet Southeasterly of <br />said referenced line "C"; thence Northeasterly along said <br />parallel line to its intersection with the above referenced line <br />'A"; thence Northwesterly along said referenced line "A" to said <br />referenced point "B', also being the point of beginning. Subject <br />to St. Francis Boulevard N.W. <br /> <br /> AND WHEREAS, the petition is filed with the Ramsey City <br />Council on December 11, 1984, is hereby declared to be signed by <br />the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby. <br />This declaration is made in conformity to the Ramsey City Code <br />Section 210.01. <br /> <br /> 2) That the petition is hereby referred to Mr. Peter <br />R. Raatikka of Bakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. and he is <br />instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed <br />advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the <br />proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best <br />be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, <br />and the estimated o~st of the improv~ent as recomme~. <br /> <br /> 3) That said report is hereby ordered contingent upon <br />the applicants escrow payment of $500.00 to cover the feasibility <br />oosts. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was <br />duly seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg and upon vote being <br />taken thereon, the followin9 voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Van Wagner, Sorteberg, <br />Schlueter and Reimann <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br /> None <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by <br /> Resolution {84-255 <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />