My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/28/1985
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1985
>
Agenda - Council - 05/28/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 9:36:50 AM
Creation date
8/3/2004 12:27:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/28/1985
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
328
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />COUNTY OF ANOKA <br /> <br />COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 <br /> <br />Mr. Lloyd Schnelle, Administrator <br />City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Blvd. N.W. <br />Anoka, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Schnelle: <br /> <br />May 6, 1985 <br /> <br />I am writing to inform you that the Anoka County Board of Commissioners, <br />at o Special Meeting of Thursday, May 2, 1985, approved the attached <br />Abatement Team Recommendation regarding a procurement process for a <br />Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) facility capable of processing a minimum of <br />tons per day or more of mixed municipal waste. This action is a result of <br />several months of very intense work by Anoka County analyzing all of the <br />sol id waste processi ng facility al ternatives. <br /> <br />As indicated in the recommendation, we will proceed on a staged <br />procurement process. That is to say, we will request proposals for a refuse- <br />derived fuel facility capable of processing a minimum of/~00 tons per day or <br />more from the qualified vendors of NSP/UPA, Swentec, and Waste <br />Technology. The County Board will then select a vendor or vendors whose <br />proposals are acceptable in principle and begin negotiating to the paint of <br />contract or rejection. If unable to secure an acceptable contract, the process <br />will be repeated with the second ranked process, that being a b,00 ton-per-day <br />moss burn co-generation facility. <br /> <br />The z~O0 ton-per-day figure was selected based on a study performed for <br />Anoka County regarding the amount of solid waste Anoka County generates <br />at a minimum per day. Although Anoka County will only be able to guarantee <br />to a facility what we alone generate, the opportunity to work with other <br />counties for a larger facility continues should it be beneficial to Anoka <br />County. <br /> <br />One of the financing tools the County applied for and received is an <br />application for ~8,500,000 in industrial development revenue bonds. It is <br />felt that the use of industrial development revenue bonds would be very <br />important to the project c~d assisting in keeping the tipping fee as Iow as <br />possi bi e. <br /> <br />We have established a very aggressive schedule working towards securing a <br />contract with a vendor no later than October 22, 1985. <br /> <br />Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.