Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />event cosponsored by the Council and several minority organizations <br />was held to inform minority con~nunity leaders about the Council, <br />inform Council members about important issues in the region°s <br />minority co+mnunities, and discuss how the Council can better serve <br />and involve minority people in regional planning. <br /> <br />ISSUES IN CITIZEN PARTICIPATION <br /> <br />During the past year, the Metropolitan Council has taken a serious look <br />at its citizen participation structure and process, in order to assess <br />how successful it has been at receiving public input into regional <br />decisions. Four sources have been tapped to assist in this effort: a <br />staff ad hoc committee representing Council departments and programs that <br />have had active citizen participation efforts over the past few years; a <br />group of people from outside the Council who have been active partici- <br />pants in and observers of the Council's decision-making process; a <br />Council survey of 195 mayors, town board chairs and county board chairs <br />in the region; and the Council's Metropolitan and Comnunity Development <br />Con~ittee. <br /> <br />Four major issue areas were identified and several recon~endations were <br />made to guide the Council in strengthening its citizen participation <br />program. These issues and recommendations form the basis for the citizen <br />particiption goals, objectives and strategies presented in Part V. <br /> <br />The major issues and recon~nendatlons cited by the above sources are: <br /> <br />EARLY INPUT INTO THE PLANNING PROCESS <br /> <br />Potentially~ffected groups and individuals need to be brought <br />into the planning process earlier. In some cases, very basic <br />policy decisions have been made before public input is requested, <br />putting the public in a reactive role rather than a proactive, <br />participatory role. Also, without early citizen input, Council staff <br />and Councilmembers may become defensive of their technical and policy <br />decisions, and thus reluctant to change them because of public <br />reaction. <br /> <br />The Council needs to have a more direct relationship with local <br />governments. Local officials want individual Council members to <br />holcknore meetings with local officials in their districts to discuss <br />emerging problems or policy proposals at a point early enough in the <br />planning or decision-making process for input to be effective. <br /> <br />Potential conflict should be dealt with early in the planninq <br />process. Timely citizen involvement is crucial in helping manage <br />the conflict that certain projects naturally generate. <br /> <br />Council programs need to open up the pl~nninq process before recom- <br />mendation~ are Keleased for public hearing. All programs need to <br />consider public participation techniques ~ther than mandated public <br />hearings, which occur near the end of the decision-making process. <br />Problems are sure to arise when recon~nendations for implementation <br />are made without input from those who are responsible for <br />implementation. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />