Laserfiche WebLink
! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />C. COMBINED LIG~{TING ON SHARED POLES <br /> <br /> Determine if the poles between the two south softball/soccer fields <br /> and between the two north and the two south fields can be used as <br /> common (shared) poles to accomodate lighting at each of the various <br /> fields. Based on the present layout and pole sizes required for the <br /> softball/soccer fields, it is unlikely that we can combine the <br /> lighting for the two fields on the pole between these two fields. <br /> The possibility may exist on between the two north softball fields <br /> but not likely between the north and the south fields. This <br /> will have to be investigated further. <br /> <br />D. ESTIMATES FOR THE PROPOSED SPORTFIELD LIGHTING. <br /> <br />The approximate estimates were indicated in the previous paragraph but <br />it appears that if we were going to provide just one ballfield that the <br />approximate cost for lighting this ballfield with the electrical <br />service requirements would be in the neighborhood of seventy thousand <br />dollars ($70,000). The cost obtained from the various fixture <br />suppliers was for material only except for Musco. Musco's proposal, <br />as shown on the attached drawing, is to provide layout, design, <br />material and installation for both fields using wood poles at an <br />estimated cost of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). Their <br />layout is using four poles per field and sharing one common pole. <br /> <br />Using 35 - 1500 W metal Halide per field for a total of 70 fixtures. <br /> <br /> In lieu of wood poles, steel poles, with concrete bases and a man <br /> <br />cage (platform on each pole), could be provided. The approximate <br /> <br /> <br />