Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Counc i lmembe r <br />findings of fact: <br /> <br />moved the adoption of the following <br /> <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> MR. DONALD NIEN(~ <br /> <br />1. That the Applicant has applied for a Board of Adjustment <br />variance to oonstruct an accessory structure larger than allowed <br />by City O~. <br /> <br />2. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment <br />for a public hearing on June 25, 1985, and that said public <br />hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said <br />public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these <br />findings by reference. <br /> <br />3. That the Applicant's property is generally known as 8426 <br />164th Circle N.W. and is located in the R-1 Residential District. <br /> <br />4. Ihat the subject property is approximately one acre in size. <br /> <br />5. That the Applicant's request is to construct a 24' x 36' <br />accessory structure with an area of 864 square feet. The <br />accessory structure is proposed to be used as a garage. The <br />existing structure on the subject property presently has an <br />attached garage. <br /> <br />6. That the City Code restricts the square footage of accessory <br />structures to 624 square feet on parcels of land less than 2-1/2 <br />acres. <br /> <br />7. That there may be exceptional, unique or extraordinary <br />circumstances or conditions applying to the property in question <br />as to the intended use of the property that do not apply <br />generally to other propertiesinthesamezoningdistrict. <br /> <br />8. That such variance may be necessary for the preservation and <br />enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that <br />possessed by other properties in the same district and in the <br />same vicinity. The possibility of increased financial return <br />shall not in itself be ~--ned sufficient to warrant a variance. <br /> <br />9. That the authorization of such variance will not be of <br />substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not <br />materially impair the intent or purpose of this ordinance or the <br />public interest. <br /> <br />10. That the condition or situation of the subject property, or <br />the intended use of the property for which the variance is <br />sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make <br />reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation <br />for such conditions or situation. <br /> <br /> <br />