My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/23/1985
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1985
>
Agenda - Council - 07/23/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 9:38:38 AM
Creation date
8/3/2004 2:43:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/23/1985
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ozs~rict pursuant to this paragraph (3) unless the <br />authority has concluded an agreement or agreements <br />for the development of at least 50 percent of the <br /> <br />I acreage having the unusual soil or terrain de~t- <br /> ciencies, which agreement provides recourse for t <br /> he <br /> <br /> authority should the development not be completed," <br />I Subsection 2,12. Duration of ?ax Increment Financin~ <br /> District Ho. 1. The duration of Tax Increment Financing <br />I District No. 1 Is expected to be twenty-three (23) years <br /> from the receipt of the first tax increment, The date of <br /> receipt of the first tax increment will be 1986. <br /> <br />I Subsection 2.13. Estimated Impact on Other Taxin~ Ju- <br /> risdictions' The estimated impact on other taxing jur£s- <br />i dictions assumes construction would have occurred without <br /> the creation of a Tax Increment Financing D£strzct No. 1. <br /> If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, <br /> <br /> the impact is $0 to other entities. Rotwithstanding the <br />I fact the fiscal impact on the other taxing juris- <br /> tha~ <br /> dictions is $0 due to the fact that the financing would not <br /> <br /> have occurred without the assistance of the city, the lol- <br />l lowing estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District <br /> No. I would be as follows if the 'but for' test was not met= <br /> <br />Entity <br /> <br />Anoka County <br />City <br />S.D. ~11 <br /> <br />IMPACT ON TAX BASE <br /> <br />Tax Base <br /> <br />1,062,665,311 <br /> 53,301,8&& <br /> ~3,901,063 <br /> <br />Original Future Captured <br />Assessed Assessed Assessed <br />Value Value Value <br /> <br />29,858 1,758,812 1,728,95~ <br />29,858 1,758,812 1,728,95~ <br />29,8~8 1,758,812 1,728,9~ <br /> <br />~ of <br />Captured <br />Assessed <br />Value Co <br /> <br /> .163 <br />3.2&~ <br /> .318 <br /> <br />I Entity <br /> <br /> /~'toka County <br />I City <br /> S.D. 911 <br /> <br />IMPACT ON MILL RATES <br /> <br /> Special Districts <br />I Total~ <br /> (1) Other taxing entities <br /> <br />Current <br />Mill Rate <br /> <br />Potential <br />Taxes <br /> <br />27.017 46,711 <br />17.314 29,935 <br />52.830 91,341 <br />1.237 2,139 <br />98.398 <br /> <br />include Metropolitan Mosquito <br /> <br />I( Control District, Anoka County Library, Rice Creek Watershed <br /> District, Metropolitan Council, .Metropolitan Transit Commis- <br /> sion, Vocational School District. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.