Agenda - Council - 07/23/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I Councilmember findings of fact~ moved the adoption of the following FINDIR(IS OF FAC~ ! i~, 3AMF~ ~ 1. That the Applicant has applied for a Board of Adjustment varianoe to construct an accessory structure larger than allowed city oxy. 2, That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment I for a public hearing on July 23, 1985, and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearings are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by referenoe. I I I I I 3. That the Applicant's property is generally known as 6540 169th Lane N.W. and is located in the R-1 Residential District. 4. ~hat the subject lxoperty is approximately one acre in size. ! I I i I I I I 5. That the Applicant's request is to construct a 28' x 36' attached three car garage with an area of 1008 square feet. The existing attached garage is proposed to be converted into a workshop and living area. 6. That the City Code defines attached garages with areas greater than 824 square feet as accessory structures. 7. ~hat the City Code restricts the total square footage of an accessory structure to 624 square feet on parcels of land less than 2-1/2 acres. 8. That there may be exceptional, unique or extraordinary cirammtances or conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply germrally to other p~operties in the same zoning district. 9. ~hat such varianoe may be necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity. The possibility of increased financial return shall not in itself be deened sufficient to warrant a variance. 10. That the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the intent or purpose of this ordinance or the public interest. 11. That the condition or situation of the subject-property, or the intended use of the property for which the variance is sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situation.