My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/22/1985
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1985
>
Agenda - Council - 10/22/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 9:43:15 AM
Creation date
8/4/2004 10:22:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/22/1985
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART I1: METRO AREA WIDE COMPARISON <br /> <br />Determine market values of three typical homes in Ramsey <br />valued at $67,000, $80,000 and $100,000 if these homes were <br />located in the following cities: <br /> <br />Spring Lake Park <br />Apple Valley <br />Champlin <br />Plymouth <br /> <br />Comments: <br /> <br />Homes used must be of similar style construction, age, square <br />footage and located on a comparable lot. <br /> <br />As the commu~Ltles li~ted abov~ provide the basL~ fo.~ comparisons <br />in al~ fo~ tas~ (A, B, C ~nd D) of Part Il, the following <br />d~cussion is applicable to ~ of them. <br /> <br />The validity o~ tills analy~i~ L~ dependent on the aLmLlariZLea <br />of the uni~ being compared (rcf~ed to as .~ample stratification). <br />What are tho.~e factors that contribute to the v~lue of homes, <br />busin~s~ and properXu]? Several wm~e listed in the RFP: <br /> <br />· Construction type/style <br />. Squ~re footage of floor <br /> The lot that the st~uctz~t¢ occupies <br /> Type of s~ree~ lhat the ~L~ucture fron~ on <br /> <br />But there are sev~al other, mote ~ubj£ctive facto,t~ that will <br />~ikely affect the value more t;.:an its proximity to o~ adverse <br />land us e, including: <br /> <br /> /mage of commu~ty <br /> Image of the whole sector -' <br /> ~ ~ ~i~e m~topoLiCan area <br /> Acces.~ibility <br /> Neighborhood (and ne~by dcvelo~e~--maybe ne~,door) <br />. Age/m~y of commun~y and n~ighbo~ood <br /> N~ con~Lo~ ( <br />. City req~e~a (not e~u the a~e being a~yzed b~ <br /> wh~ wo~d be <br /> <br />W~ t~ropoae a reevaluatLon of ~;,.~ ¢ommunLtie~ .,,e~_~cted <br />com/;~tLSon so th~ thc' ~e~uLt5 of the study w~ be a~ vattd <br />a~ pos~ib~ a~ w~ llav~ thc ~ast ~h~Lhood of succe~ <br />ch~engea. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.