My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/22/1985
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1985
>
Agenda - Council - 10/22/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 9:43:15 AM
Creation date
8/4/2004 10:22:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/22/1985
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~r. Daniel ~. Comeau <br />September 25, I9~I5 <br />Pag(' lhree <br /> <br />pages lo-14. A Remedial Investigation generally consists of submission of <br />an Evaluation Report before extensive field activity is conducted. The <br />results of the field investigation are then compiled and discussed in a <br />Remedial Investigation Final Report. The WMMI/Anoka Sanitary Landfill <br />Remedial Investigation is unusual because WMMI voluntarily accelerated the <br />initial field program before the Evaluation Report was submitted to meet <br />requirements of Anoka County and its own desire to begin immediate <br />investigation of the situation. <br /> <br />WMMI has already submitted drilling logs, location maps, water quality <br />data, and water level data to the MPCA for timely review and discussion. <br />Submitted data is recognized to be partial and preliminary in light of <br />the full anticipated field investigation program. Extensive conclusions <br />cannot be reliably derived from the data obtained at this time. <br /> <br />A telephone conversation was held on June 24, 1985 between Dan Comeau, <br />Bruce Nelson, and Larry Johnson, with the following specific questions <br />raised: "Is it necessary to submit interpretational data (e.g., geological <br />cross-sections) in the Evaluation Report? Why not wait until the Final <br />Report." Later the same day, we were notified that it was permissible to <br />wait with interpretational data, such as geological cross-sections, and <br />not include such information in the Evaluation Report. Based on this <br />understanding, detailed discussions of "the hydrology, stratigraphy, and <br />geology" were not included in the Evaluation Report. <br /> <br />Throughout the current Remedial Investigation, an on-going internal review <br />and analysis of available data is taking place which is consistent with <br />the phased approach to the investigation as described in Appendix A to <br />the Consent Order (pp. 8-9). The data is being reviewed to better <br />evaluate hydrogeological conditions, to plan subsequent sampl)ng <br />activities, and to assess the need for WMMI to propose modifications to <br />the program or additional phases of investigation as contemplated in <br />Appendix A, if necessary to determine the nature and extent of real or <br />potential releases. <br /> <br />It is understood, based on your letter, that MPCA staff desires access to <br />any documents prepared by WMMI as part of this evaluation process prior to <br />WMMI's proposal of new phases, if any are needed. WMMI understood the <br />Consent Order to call for completion of the investigation in phases with <br />proposals by WMMI at the conclusion of each phase for additional work <br />needed, if any, in Work Plan Addenda. Updated geological cross-sections <br />will be prepared following installation of four additional groundwater <br />monitoring wells which were recently approved by MPCA. Copies of the <br />information will be provided to MPCA, along with the drilling logs for the <br />new wells. Water level and water quality data will continue to be <br />suppl~ed to MPCA as it becomes available. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.