Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />'1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />US Deportment <br />of Transportation <br /> <br />Federal Aviation <br />Administration <br /> <br />Airports District Office <br />6301 - 34th Avenue South <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450 <br /> <br />November 19, 1984 <br /> <br />Mr. Lloyd Schnelle, Administrator <br />City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Boulevard <br />Ramsey, Minnesota 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Schnelle: <br /> <br />The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an Aeronautical Study of the <br />Preliminary Airport Layout Plan for the Gateway Industrial Airport, Ramsey, <br />Minnesota, consisting of one sheet', undated. The study was based on the safe <br />and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft. Review <br />included public ctrcularization for aeronautical comments. No letters of <br />objection were received in response to the circular. <br /> <br />Based on that study, No. 84-AGL-697-NRA, we have no objections provided the <br />runway thresholds are located or displaced, as necessary, and clearly marked <br />so as to provide at least a 20:1 approach surface slope over all obstacles <br />located within the runway approach surface areas. <br /> <br />The Federal Aviation Administration cannot prevent'the construction of <br />structures near an airport. The airport environs can only be protected by <br />such means as zoning ordinances or acquisition of property rights. <br /> <br />This determination, issued in accordance with FAR Part 77, concerns the effect <br />of this proposal on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by <br />aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of any compliance responsibilities <br />relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local <br />government body. <br /> <br />Any change in airport operating category (VFR to IFR) will require a new <br />airspace analysis and determination. <br /> <br />This determination does not mean FAA approval or disapproval of the physical <br />development involved in the proposal. It ia a determination with respect to <br />the safe and efficient use of airspace by aircraft with respect to the safety <br />of persons and property on the ground. <br /> <br />In making this determination, the FAA has considered matters such as the <br />effect the proposal would have on existing or planned traffic patterns of <br />neighboring airports, the effects it would have on the existing airspace <br />structure and projected programs of 'the F.AA, the effects it would have on the <br />safety of persons and property on the ground, and:the effects that existing or <br />proposed msnmad.e obJects'(o~ file with th~ FAA) and known natural objects <br />within the affected area would have on the airport proposal. <br /> <br /> <br />