Agenda - Council - 10/23/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

R;?,ISEY CFIh' COUNCIL FJNIJJNGS OF FACF RE. 'FO.l ANDERSON REZONING REQUEST ].. ']]mt ~q~p]icant applied to the City to rezone a five acre tract of ]~d on the NE corner of 167th Avenue from Residential (R-l) to Business 2. That thc subjec~ property J s located in the Transitional Area of the Ci ty. 5. That the City Cotmcil held a duly advertised and noted public hearing on the application on August 21, 1978, M:ich public hearing minutes are in-. co'rpor~ted herein by reference. 4. That the Planning Commission reviewed the application and made recommend~ at.ions to the City Council in its minutes of August 21, 1978 and October 10~ ]978, wh:ich reco,~nendations the City Com~cil has reviewed. 5. 'II,at the applicant requested that the matter not be placed on the City Conncil's agenda of August 28, 1978. 6. 'lZat the City, after m~nerous public hearings, meetings and study adopted an amendment to its Comprehensive Plan, said amen&nent being da~ed March ]5, 1976 and revised March, 1978. 7. 'fl~at the goals, policys and objectives of said amended Comprehensive Plan are adopted herein by reference~ That specifically the amended Comprehensive Plan provides that the urban area of the City shall be south of 153rd Avenue for the reasons as set forth in the Comprehensive P] ~n amendment. 8. That land is avai]able for a use as proposed by the applicant in area below i53rd in the Urban Area. 9. That the only co~nercial business's operating in the general area of that proposed by the applicant to be rezoned are those business's which are located in building's existing prior to the Comprehensive Plan amendment. 10. That to permit the proposed use and rezoning request would act as a precedent to other similar commercial uses and rezoning requests and this would not be in conformance with the City's planning objective, and re- quirements as prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan and its amendments~ 11. That the area proposed for rezoning is not served by any municipal utilities. 12. That the City Council recently denied a similar business rezoning re~ quest for the property South of 167th and West of Highway 47~ 13. That the City Council received and reviewed a written petition signed by some 400 individuals who indicated they were in favor of the applicants Janprovement.