Agenda - Council - 10/23/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

TO: City Administrator FROM: Building official RE: Accessory Buildings DATE: September 18, 2978 As the above referenced subject has been a matter of concern for sometime, I have been giving it much consideration. It would appear to me that the only appropriate solution to this matter is to base the size of an accessary building on the size of the lot. In my opinion it would appear that one percent of the lot area would be a a viable solution to the problem. For example, this would allow an accessory building of about 400 plus square feet on. a one acre lot and 1000 plus square feet on a 2% acre lot.- However,~ the surround.~ng lot sizes should also be 'considered in the granting ' of the permit. If a lot larger than one acre is ~loc~ted'in~what is basically a one acre area, the building size should be limited accordingly. In m~ opinion th~s could be handled quite easily administrativly by the zoning officer. Individuals that felt they were treated un£a.frly could appeal the zoning administrators decision to the City Council. In conclusion it would be my opinion accessory buildings should be restricted accordingly. (1) Parcels one acre and under:- 1% of the gross lot'~. not to exceed 400 sq ft.' (2) Parcels from one acre to 2.5 acres: 1% of the gross lot size not to exceed 1000 sq ft. (3) Parcels over 2.5 acres: 1% of the gross lot area not to exceed 1500 sq ft. This restriction could apply to all except agricultural land where building restrictions would not apply. Agricultural land defined is any parcel 20 acres or larger used primarily for agri- cultural purposes. Except for housing, building permits are not required on agricultural buildings. This information is for your information and only one indiv- iduals opinion. You may use it as pou desire. CRB:as