Agenda - Council - 08/10/2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

be about the same as the difference in cost if the driveway were to come from the other side, which is approximately six to eight thousand dollars. · Amendment by Councilmember Kurak, second by Councilmember Strommen, that the motion on the floor state that the City move forward with ne,,otiations to purchase the road easement through the Kaas and Dusbabek properties at 160" Lane and, if necessary, to' authorize condemnation. The easement acquired will not be constructed as a standard City street but its use will be restricted to a single home access until such time .aS municipal sewer and ,~ater is available to the properties adjacent to the easement,, that there WilI. be no additional tree remo"Oal .. -...' ':.. .... on the easement, and that Mr. Bauer shall be required to pay"30% o'f the City's costs to acqui~'i":i:;-.. :- :/' the rS~ht-of-wav, not to exceed $8,000, and )that Mr. Bauer will be responsible for blacktop-:':.::' surface to be installed on this driveway access. ...:::: ~...":.f' Further Discussion: Councilmember Elvig commented his posil:i0n is he believes this is an easement issue according to an initial. City mistake and.the Ci.ty 'is..requiring .Mr. Bauer to participate financially in t'his decision. Councihnember Cook informed the landowners he is very sorry., and this is a hardship for everyone. He is sorry this took so ]on~ and sorry, this is the resolution that ~s reqmred. He 'knows what it is like to have something happen on your land. He does not see any other way, and he.hopes this works out for everyone i.nvo!-ved. - Motion on amendment c. arried. Voting Yes': Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Strommen, Cook, and Elvig. Voting No: Councilmember Zimmerman. Amended motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Ely]g, Kurak, Pearson. and Strommen. Voting No: Co.uncilmember Zirmmerman. Councih'nember Strommen thanked all the pames involved in this long process. Case #11: Request for Final Site Plan Re,dew of NAU Holdings L.L.C. Case of Sharp and Associates Assistant Community Development Director Tmdgeon explained this final site plan complies with the prelhninary site plan approved by the City Council on June 22, 2004, with respect to Floor Area Ratio, setbacks, parking, and landscaping requirements. The proposed development also meets the Public Realm/Streetscape, Site Development, and .Architecture standards established in the draft Town Center Development Guidelines. The ~ading, drainage, and utili:ty plans will need to be revised in accordance with the Staff Review Letter dated July 23, 2004'. The revised landscaping plan is acceptable. Assistant Coll-illlUl*lity Development Director Trudgeon advised there have been some corrections made to the development permit. The contract will be between NAU and the City, rather than Mr. Sharp and the City. The other correction relates to the area outside of the development being constructed by Ri?C. namely 145"~ Avenue. That is now in a separate developlnent a~eement. He noted Mr. Sharp would like to start this project as soon as possible. Typically several things are required to begin, which are the plat being required, sigmage, and payments of fees and eSCrOWS. CiD' Council/July 27, 21104 Page 17 of 34 -293-