My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/10/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 08/10/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:29:58 PM
Creation date
8/9/2004 7:46:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/10/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the future streets would be platted so when sewer comes in we <br />ah'eady know where it will go. <br /> <br />Associate Plmmer Geisler indicated the land would need to be re-platted when sewer comes in <br />because for now the areas would be platted as outlots. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked about development fees. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated they are actually adding costs for development because they are <br />requiring additional survey's, which add to the cost, and the additional fees for Platting the <br />outlots. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked who is responsible for the homeowner's association costs. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised the developer would create the .association and be the first <br />member, with membership transferred as lots are sold. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated the City will want to see a high <br />level of control in these homeowner's associations. He -stated they would want to see a well- <br />funded, well established association that could address any problems with the communal septic <br />system. He indicated the association would control all the land of the lots and the communal <br />septic system land. <br /> <br />Corrm~issioner Van Scoy clarified these would be urban sized lots in a rural area, and developers <br />would not be allowed to create two and a half acre lots and put a house on them. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Tmdgeon stated they have a lot of two and a half <br />acre lots out there now that someone could buy and put a house on, but no new lots that size can <br />be created. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated this will apply to simple lot splits also. She stated an owner <br />can still split a lot for a family member, but only up to three-quarters of an acre. <br /> <br />Comlnissioner Van Scoy stated he was thi~fldng that they were looking more at the possibility of <br />someone buying two and a half acres, where you would have four houses in the middle, but each <br />would own their acreage. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated the problem they have is most <br />two and a half acre property owners do not want to split their land. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Johnson added the problem with two and a half acre splits is that it is difficult to get <br />al/the owners to come together when utilities do come in, and it also creates a large assessment <br />because of the property size. He stated someone may want to sell some of their property off to <br />help pay the assessment but they calmot do that without the neighbors agreeing to split also. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/July 1, 2004 <br /> Page 9 of 13 <br /> <br />-51- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.