Laserfiche WebLink
Associate Planner Geisler stated that the City received an application from TSM Development, <br />Inc. for a minor subdivision sketch plan as part of their plan to construct a mini-storage facility <br />on the property generally located on Ramsey Boulevard and Bunker Lake Boulevard. She <br />indicated the sketch plan proposes to replat Outlot A of Regency Pond into one buitdable lot. She <br />noted the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan.at the July 1, 2004 meeting and tabled <br />the site plan to July 12, 2004 in order to provide time for staff and the developer to receive <br />cormnents from Anoka County. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised that Outlot A of Regency Pond is 4.8 acres and TSM <br />Development, Inc. is proposing to construct a 19,440-, 13,600-, 10,200-, and a 15,6002square- <br />foot storage building on Outlot A of Regency Pond. The proposed development is located in the <br />E-1 Employment District; mini-storage facilities are a permitted use in this distri'ct. She noted' <br />that the grading, drainage, and utility plans are being reviewed as part of the CNP Storage site <br />plan and all drainage ponds shown on the site must be dedicated as drainage and utility <br />easements on the final plat. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated the plat proposes to gain access through an individual access <br />off of Ramsey Boulevard. However, as-.was discussed at the July 1 st meeting, staff received some <br />initial comments from Anoka County that indicated the County would not permit any additional <br />access onto Ramsey Boulevard. She stated that because the issue of how the site will gain street <br />access is so critical to overall site design, in addition to outstanding drainage issues, staff is <br />recommending the sketch plan be tabled until site access details are resolved with Anoka County. <br />She noted that at the July 1, 2004 Planning Co~ranission meeting, the applicant indicated a desire <br />for the Planning Commission to take action on the sketch plan. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated the site plan is meeting or exceeding the required setbacks. The <br />development is proposing to construct a total of 58,840 square feet on a 4.8-acr~ parcel and lot <br />coverage has been calculated at 28%, which is under the 45% maximum lot coverage restriction <br />established in City Code. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated, that the landscaping plan has .been revised to include <br />additional sl~rubs in the buffe~,ward to the east; however additional revisions will be needed based <br />on the final design of site access. She noted that at the July 1st meeting the Planning Commission' <br />recommended a privacy fence between the proposed development and the residential properties' <br />to the south, east, and north; the site plan will need to be revised to include this information. <br /> <br />Steve Schmidt, TSM Development, Inc., stated-that 'he met with the City Engineer on July 9, <br />2004 to discuss access and drainage issues. He stated that he is asking for approval of the site <br />plan at this time in order to force the County to ad'tress the issue of access. He advised that he is <br />>villing to erect a privacy fence and requested SOlne consideration be given to perhaps reducing <br />the landscaping requirements. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated that the current design of the site requires a 60 foot bufferyard <br />area with additional plantings at a minimum rate of 30% of the required landscaping. She noted <br />that if a privacy fence is erected, the additional 30% requirement would be reduced by 10%. <br /> <br />-62- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/July 12, 2004 <br /> · Page 2 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />