Laserfiche WebLink
Case #1: Creation of a Park Fund <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund explained the purpose of this case was to discuss the creation of a new <br />Park Fund and its possible funding sources and uses. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund explained most park projects are currently being funded from the Park <br />Trust Fund, which is funded from Park Dedication Fees received from developers when a parcel <br />is developed. Park dedication fees are deposited 50% into the respective park district and the <br />remaining 50% can be spent in any park district. While this fund has a healthy balance, it does <br />not take into consideration those park districts that have little or no development fees to help <br />fund necessary projects. Also, the City is currently in a growth mode, with much development <br />occurring, which generates park dedication fees. What happens when development stops, the <br />parks still need to be updated, maintained, etc. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund noted that it is felt that with the additional park costs attributed to the <br />ongoing maintenance, improvements, and acquisition that it was necessary to begin the <br />implementation of an additional fund. Council directed staff at the Finance Committee meeting <br />of May 25, 2004, to have this item presented at the June 10, 2004 Park Commission meeting so <br />that the City Council and Park Commission could jointly determine the necessary funding uses <br />and sources of this fund. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund stated the creation of an additional fund requires the adoption of an <br />ordinance amending Chapter 3, Section 3.40 entitled "City Funds". <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns asked if this was an addition to or was it included in the current Park Fund. <br />Ms. Lurid stated it was a separate fund. She stated that there is The Park Improvement Revolving <br />Fund and this fund is only for park improvements and construction but not upkeep. She stated <br />they wanted to have a blended fund that would allow for acquisition and maintenance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds asked where the funds for maintenance came from. Ms. Lund stated they are <br />included in the general fund right now and subject to the levy limit. She stated this would allow <br />any of the upkeep coming online with the new parks, if levy limits were to remain in place; they <br />will always be contained to what is in the general fund budget for the park maintenance. This <br />would allow for a rainy day sort of fund. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig stated a lot of this started last year when they were struggling with some of <br />their budgeting. He stated they ran into some overages in the General Fund and they were <br />wondering how they were going to disperse some of those funds. What the Park Commission is <br />running into is they are developing the community but they do not know how they are going to <br />pay for maintenance in the long term when the opportunity for new growth has stopped and they <br />cannot keep the new growth happening. He stated this way, they can put some dollars into a fund <br />sort of like an endowment and they would have something they would pull off of on a yearly <br />basis. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns asked where the funds were coming from. Councilmember Elvig stated they <br />were coming from development dollars. <br /> <br /> <br />