Laserfiche WebLink
P & Z <br />8/21/72 <br /> <br /> I:o~:ion by rl. er-'y Z:]';:,.',~,r .... n, seco.,,ted by K~thv Schneider to recommen5 to <br /> t~e CJty Counc-~l to accept the engJneer report and recommendatfions <br /> <br /> wi~h the ~>:ception t~at the cul-fle-s,~c mentioned in ~ff/~ of engineers <br /> remort be ck:anged to ,~ tomnorary turmsround consisting of class 5 with <br /> s s~-abl~, base. Mot, fi. on carried 4-0. <br /> N. W. <br /> Item 4. ~ental C!~nic - Dr. T. W. A~derson. (corner of 167t~ <br /> <br /> Mr. Pete ~astikka v. as prez'ent with the Engineer's re~ort on this project, <br /> a~d exr:!ained [hat since he had only bee~ presented with a sketch plan <br /> an~ bad hoC. beer aware of ~.he exac~ e.r~a ~o be ~,, ..... ~ned~ bis report <br /> included ingot, mr, itoh on a'north lot which is not under consideration at <br /> this time. Consequently, it, e,.~ .,.~ and the fmrst sentence of id8 do not <br /> refer to the property which rezoninf has been requested on. Mr. Raatikka <br /> ~.a~d thgt ~.o~_ls test indicated a 1~' water table, with sand soils~ and <br /> s. verc Zest of 5 ~inutes ~er inch. Gerry Zi,t:merrnan stated that he would <br /> be in favor of having the front half of the pretty left undeveloped. <br />T't was suggested that the actual structure be on the clay soils area to <br />allow, the sa~d area to be used for the septic system. Dr. Anderson <br />.explained ths~t Helium Street will eventually connect with the adjacent <br />propert, y to allow better access to that area, and that he has filed for <br />a ner~-it fro~ the State Hwy. Dept. Rezoning to be from R-1 to B-1. <br /> <br />Motion by Art Dunn, secon.~ed by Ge~v,,,, Zimmerman to recommend to the <br /> 6~t,y Councj. 1 that based on the Engineer's revort of August 17~ 1978 with <br /> the exception of ;'[6 and the first sentence of:,'.'~8-, rezoning of_ this prop- <br /> erty be ~llov,'ed and that a a.,velopm~nt contract between the City and <br /> pro~erty owners be a.afted limiting the remaining undeveloped portion of <br /> marcel upti2 services are available. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />The r~bov~ motion was based on the follow facts: <br />1.) Only land in sre~ adjacent to existing businesses suitable for this <br />type of facility from soil and site characteristics. <br /> <br />2.) Due to being located in immediate area of an east-west street, facility <br />will effectively service large number of residents. <br /> <br />~.) Tbfis type of activity would not devaluate adjacent neighborhood.s, and <br />would be an asset to community, and would provide good base tax. <br /> <br />4.) Turn lane and continuation of Helium ,Street would help eliminate <br />undesireeble traffic ~atterns in this ~rea. <br /> <br />5.) th~s t,y~e o~ fsci!ity would provide suitable buffer between business <br />and ~-' * <br /> <br /> ,Schnelle suggested that the 6ozmission examine the possib!ity of a <br />snecial zoning area for remaining undeveloped corners in this area. <br /> <br />Item 5. Informational <br /> <br />It was noted, that each 6ommission member received a copy of the zoning <br />ordinance, and Mr. Schnelle asked that it be examined so that he could <br />answer any questions the members may have. <br /> <br />Motion by Gerry Zimmerman, seconded by Art Dunn to adjourn. Notion <br />carried 4-0. Meetin~ adjourned 10:15 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />