My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/22/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 01/22/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:35:42 PM
Creation date
8/10/2004 10:54:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/22/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Ramsey <br /> <br />15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W.~ AnoVa, Minnesota 55303 · (612) 427-1410 <br /> <br /> December 27, 1978 <br /> <br />Ms. Sandra Gardebring, Director <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />1935 West County Road B2 <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br /> <br />Dear Ms. 6ardebring: <br /> <br />Through the past year our City Council has directed the attention of your <br />Agency to what it feels is a severe shortcoming in the exercise of your <br />responsibility for controlling ground water pollution. The case in point <br />has been the. Anoka Landfill, which is located in th~ City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />The latest episode in this effort is a letter dated December 3, 1978 over <br />the signature of Mr. Thomas P. Clark, Chief, Enforcement Section, Division <br />of Solid Waste. Mr. Clark in that letter refers to a meeting on November 9 <br />and concludes in that letter that "in the Solid Waste Division staff's <br />professional judgement, the Anoka Municipal Sanitary Landfill has not <br />significantly influenced the water quality in the area. Furthermore, the <br />current monitoring system appears adequate, providing data among wells is <br />compared to each other, as well as to background data. Therefore, water <br />monitorxng will continue as at present until such time as the results in- <br />dicate that changes in the current monitoring system are justified." <br /> <br />Surely, Mr. Clark knows that this landfill was started several years before <br />any monitoring effort was initiated and therefore, there is no background <br />information on ground water quality against which any scientifically valid <br />comparison can be made. <br /> <br />In the cburse of the November 9th meeting, your representatives stated that <br />since monitoring Well #S was somewhat isolated from the landfill and is the <br />newest of the monitoring wells, it has been viewed by your Agency as the <br />"control" well. This means that its quality has been accepted as the stan- <br />dard of ground water quality in the area and that deterioration of ground <br />water by landfill leachate is indicated only if samples from the other mon~ <br />itoring wells show greater levels of the measured constituents than samples <br />from Well #5. <br /> <br />Samples from Well #$ have consistently shown levels of nitrate nitrogen near <br />or in excess of the maximum permissible level for drinking water and have <br />consistently shown higher levels of chloride than either the levels in <br />other monitoring wells or levels that would normally be expected in shallow <br />ground water. <br /> <br />hhen City representatives pointed to the unlikely prospect that ground water <br />in Ramsey does not normally meet drinking water standards, your representatives <br />agreed. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.