My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/26/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 02/26/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:36:04 PM
Creation date
8/10/2004 2:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/26/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> <br />o The character of its residential base (popu- <br /> lation and household age, income, employment, <br /> trends). <br /> <br />o The character of its economic base (service, <br /> commercial and industrial development; its <br /> market, its contribution to the community; <br /> its service requirements). <br /> <br />o The type and extent of its local service pro- <br /> vision (fire, police, sewer, water, other) <br /> costs thereof; its adequacy in meeting existing <br /> needs. <br /> <br />o Local government capability (its current level <br /> of administrative procedures and personnel, <br /> their present adequacy). <br /> <br />o Competition for future growth and needed <br /> resources from other communities and sectors. <br /> <br />o Unique assets or attributes of the community <br /> (e.g., strong agricultural market, historic <br /> or ethnic significance). <br /> <br />o Physical/environmental constraints. <br /> <br />o Community goals and views for the futre. <br /> <br />The rural center planning process need not be designed for growth and expansion. <br />Indeed, not all rural centers desire growth and for many centers there are <br />strong factors which would inhibit significant growth. %.~ether a community <br />chooses to remain at its present level of development or to expand, the securing <br />of its existing residential, economic and service base is of foremost importance. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION III: <br /> <br />RECOM~IENDATION IV: <br /> <br />RECOMmeNDATION V: <br /> <br />Rural center plans and implementation programs <br />should first consider means to maintain existing <br />development, assure adequate services to the <br />existing base within its ability to pay for them, <br />and, if necessary, establish programs for the <br />revitalization of its older areas. <br /> <br />A strategy for future growth must include a <br />reasonable assessment of anticipated growth based <br />on overall regional growth projections, and <br />competition for that growth and resources to <br />support it from other rural centers, freestanding <br />growth centers, and the urban area. <br /> <br />Rural center plans must assure an adequate <br />level of services for anticipated new growth <br />that is attainable through local financing and <br />administration. <br /> <br />"Shrinking" tax bases, increasing numbers of tax exempt properties (e.g., schools, <br />churches, parks), and the continued scatteration of non-farm development outside <br />of rural center boundaries that require services of the center have created <br />serious fiscal burdens for rural centers. <br /> <br />RECOPRMENDATION VI: <br /> <br />Rural communities on the periphery of rural <br />centers should be aware of the limitations of <br />rural center service provision to their develop- <br />ment and should coordinate their development <br />plans with those of the rural centers throughout <br />the planning process. Measures which accurately <br />allocate the costs of such service provisions <br />to beneficiaries outside the rural center should <br />be initiated where lacking and updated periodi- <br />cally to reflect actual service costs. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.