Laserfiche WebLink
3/8/79 <br /> <br />Review of lot size in Industrial zoned area: <br />It was th~ consensus o~ th~'~ommissioh'~hat they would need more time and <br />input on the matter, but that without more information the lot size should <br />remain 2.5 acres. Art Dunn stated that the 2.5. acres is not necessarily a <br />set figure, and that possibly the lot size should be larger instead of smaller. <br />Motion by Art Dunn, seconded by Gerry Zimmerman that the lot size in the <br />Industrially zoned area remain as is due to the following : <br />1.) Have not received any input from the Economic Con~nission regarding this. <br />2.) May delay the need for sewer to this area, but allowing an adequate area <br /> for installing secondary systems. <br />3.) smaller size lots could seriously hamper expansion of existing businesses, <br /> plus limit initial size or type of industry in City. Motion carried 6-0. <br />It was pointed out that parking, sewer and well area needs for various types <br />of industry have to be examined further. <br /> <br />Lot Size recommendation: <br />Motion by A-~ Sorteberg, seconded by Art Dunn to amend the zoning ordinance to <br />allow the lot size required to include right-of-ways, based on the fact that <br />this would make for easier sections subdivision. Motion carried 6~0. <br /> <br />Motion by Brad Bodle, seconded by Ken Peterson to adjourn. Meeting adjourn 10:50 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Kathleen Schneider <br /> <br /> <br />