My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/10/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 01/10/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:02:40 PM
Creation date
1/11/2017 9:10:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/10/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
631
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
connect the National Park to the businesses of Ramsey. She believed that this connection would <br /> be important for bikers and also for the community that lives south of Highway 10. She stated <br /> that the National Parks know that the funds will be important and will be used and therefore <br /> thought that the City should think big and bold. Councilmember Riley stated that this would be <br /> an exciting project but they are so close to the beginning. He noted that they have not even <br /> obtain 10 percent of the funding but yet is willing to spend that much. Councilmember Williams <br /> addressed the notion that the skyway system would improve the economic development, noting <br /> that the skyway has not been a mention of the EDA or any of the experts that they have spoken <br /> to. She noted that there are at grade trail connections that could be provided in existing <br /> neighborhoods at a lower cost than the skyway. Councilmember Shryock stated that as the <br /> Council looks at this project, skyway is probably not the correct term as this would be a <br /> pedestrian bridge. She noted that these funds are for specific areas and purposes and cannot be <br /> used for other elements. She asked the longevity of the final design once established. Parks and <br /> Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that bridge technology does not change <br /> greatly over the course of several years. He explained that the $490,000 would not cover the <br /> entire cost of final design and noted that perhaps a few years down the road some amendments <br /> would need to be made but advised that this portion of the design would cover the bridge <br /> engineering. Mayor Strommen agreed that she would not want to see this project compete with <br /> other projects but noted that these funds are specific to National Parks. She stated that the <br /> Council should be careful when speaking in absolutes but agreed that this could contribute to <br /> some of the factors mentioned tonight. She noted that Ramsey is different from other river <br /> communities as they are separated from the river by the railroad tracks. She stated that other <br /> river communities are investing in their river assets and downtowns that are built near the river. <br /> She believed that it is important for Ramsey to explore its connection to the river. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers Shryock, Johns, and Kuzma. <br /> Voting No: Councilmembers Riley and Williams. Absent: Councilmember LeTourneau. <br /> 7.09: Consider Adoption of Resolution #16-12-228 Authorizing FASTLANE Funding <br /> Application for Ramsey Boulevard Railway Grade Separation Improvements <br /> The City Engineer reviewed the staff report and recommendation to adopt Resolution 916-12- <br /> 228 authorizing staff to submit a second funding application request for $11,000,000 through the <br /> Fostering Advancements in Shipping and Transportation for the Long-Term Achievement of <br /> National Efficiencies (FASTLANE) grant program for grade separating Ramsey Boulevard from <br /> the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)railway crossing north of Highway 10. <br /> Mayor Strommen asked if it would be helpful to have letters of support from legislative <br /> representatives. <br /> City Engineer Westby stated that he has letters of support from some local businesses but noted <br /> that Mr. Tinklenberg is also pursuing additional letters of support from the legislative <br /> representatives. <br /> City Council/December 13, 2016 <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.