My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 07/12/2004 - Special Meeting
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 07/12/2004 - Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:57:49 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 9:39:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special Meeting
Document Date
07/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate Planner Geisler stated that the City received an application from TSM Development, <br />Inc. for a minor subdivision sketch plan as part of their plan to construct a mini-storage facility <br />on the property generally located on Ramsey Boulevard and Bunker Lake Boulevard. She <br />indicated the sketch plan proposes to replat Outlot A of Regency Pond into one buildable lot. She <br />noted the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan at the July 1, 2004 meeting and tabled <br />the site plan to July 12, 2004 in order to provide time for staff and the developer to receive <br />comments from Anoka County. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised that Outlot A of Regency Pond is 4.8 acres and TSM <br />Development, Inc. is proposing to construct a 19,440-, 13,600-, 10,200-, and a 15,600-square- <br />foot storage building on Outlot A of Regency Pond. The proposed development is located in the <br />E-1 Employment District; mini-storage facilities are a permitted use in this district. She noted <br />that the grading, drainage, and utility plans are being reviewed as part of the CNP Storage site <br />plan and all drainage ponds shown on the site must be dedicated as drainage and utility <br />easements on the final plat. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated the plat proposes to gain access through an individual access <br />off of Ramsey Boulevard. However, as was discussed at the July lst meeting, staff received some <br />initial comments from Anoka County that indicated the County would not permit any additional <br />access onto Ramsey Boulevard. She stated that because the issue of how the site will gain street <br />access is so critical to overall site design, in addition to outstanding drainage issues, staff is <br />recommending the sketch plan be tabled until site access details are resolved with Anoka County. <br />She noted that at the July 1, 2004 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant indicated a desire <br />for the Planning Commission to take action on the sketch plan. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated the site plan is meeting or exceeding the required setbacks. The <br />development is proposing to construct a total of 58,840 square feet on a 4.8-acre parcel and lot <br />coverage has been calculated at 28%, which is under the 45% maximum lot coverage restriction <br />established in City Code. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated that the landscaping plan has been revised to include <br />additional shrubs in the bufferyard to the east; however additional revisions will be needed based <br />on the final design of site access. She noted that at the July 1st meeting the Planning Commission <br />recommended a privacy fence between the proposed development and the residential properties <br />to the south, east, and north; the site plan will need to be revised to include this information. <br /> <br />Steve Schmidt, TSM Development, Inc., stated that he met with the City Engineer on July 9, <br />2004 to discuss access and drainage issues. He stated that he is asking for approval of the site <br />plan at this time in order to force the County to address the issue of access. He advised that he is <br />willing to erect a privacy fence and requested some consideration be given to perhaps reducing <br />the landscaping requirements. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated that the current design of the site requires a 60 foot bufferyard <br />area with additional plantings at a minimum rate of 30% of the required landscaping. She noted <br />that if a privacy fence is erected, the additional 30% requirement would be reduced by 10%. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/~Iuly 12, 2004 <br /> Page 2 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.