My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/13/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2016
>
Minutes - Council - 12/13/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:29:32 PM
Creation date
1/17/2017 11:04:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
connect the National Park to the businesses of Ramsey. She believed that this connection would <br />be important for bikers and also for the community that lives south of Highway 10. She stated <br />that the National Parks know that the funds will be important and will be used and therefore <br />thought that the City should think big and bold. Councilmember Riley stated that this would be <br />an exciting project but they are so close to the beginning. He noted that they have not even <br />obtain 10 percent of the funding but yet is willing to spend that much. Councilmember Williams <br />addressed the notion that the skyway system would improve the economic development, noting <br />that the skyway has not been a mention of the EDA or any of the experts that they have spoken <br />to. She noted that there are at grade trail connections that could be provided in existing <br />neighborhoods at a lower cost than the skyway. Councilmember Shryock stated that as the <br />Council looks at this project, skyway is probably not the correct term as this would be a <br />pedestrian bridge. She noted that these funds are for specific areas and purposes and cannot be <br />used for other elements. She asked the longevity of the final design once established. Parks and <br />Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that bridge technology does not change <br />greatly over the course of several years. He explained that the $490,000 would not cover the <br />entire cost of final design and noted that perhaps a few years down the road some amendments <br />would need to be made but advised that this portion of the design would cover the bridge <br />engineering. Mayor Strommen agreed that she would not want to see this project compete with <br />other projects but noted that these funds are specific to National Parks. She stated that the <br />Council should be careful when speaking in absolutes but agreed that this could contribute to <br />some of the factors mentioned tonight. She noted that Ramsey is different from other river <br />communities as they are separated from the river by the railroad tracks. She stated that other <br />river communities are investing in their river assets and downtowns that are built near the river. <br />She believed that it is important for Ramsey to explore its connection to the river. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers Shryock, Johns, and Kuzma. <br />Voting No: Councilmembers Riley and Williams. Absent: Councilmember LeTourneau. <br />7.09: Consider Adoption of Resolution #16-12-228 Authorizing FASTLANE Funding <br />Application for Ramsey Boulevard Railway Grade Separation Improvements <br />The City Engineer reviewed the staff report and recommendation to adopt Resolution # 16-12- <br />228 authorizing staff to submit a second funding application request for $11,000,000 through the <br />Fostering Advancements in Shipping and Transportation for the Long -Term Achievement of <br />National Efficiencies (FASTLANE) grant program for grade separating Ramsey Boulevard from <br />the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railway crossing north of Highway 10. <br />Mayor Strommen asked if it would be helpful to have letters of support from legislative <br />representatives. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that he has letters of support from some local businesses but noted <br />that Mr. Tinklenberg is also pursuing additional letters of support from the legislative <br />representatives. <br />City Council / December 13, 2016 <br />Page 14 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.